|
52%
iBall Andi 4L Pulse
₹3,499
(Discontinued)
|
54%
Rio Mobile Paris
₹2,799
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
iBall Andi 4L Pulse vs Rio Mobile Paris
Comparing the iBall Andi 4L Pulse vs Rio Mobile Paris across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Rio Mobile Paris runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while iBall Andi 4L Pulse runs at 1.2 GHz, making Rio Mobile Paris the better performer.
Display: Rio Mobile Paris offers a screen size of 4.5 inches, while iBall Andi 4L Pulse offers 4 inches, making Rio Mobile Paris the larger display of the two. Rio Mobile Paris features a IPS LCD display compared to iBall Andi 4L Pulse's LCD, making Rio Mobile Paris the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both iBall Andi 4L Pulse and Rio Mobile Paris feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Rio Mobile Paris offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while iBall Andi 4L Pulse offers 0.3 MP, making Rio Mobile Paris better for front camera photography.
Battery: Rio Mobile Paris offers a higher battery capacity with 1700 mAh, while iBall Andi 4L Pulse offers 1500 mAh, making Rio Mobile Paris better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both iBall Andi 4L Pulse and Rio Mobile Paris offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: iBall Andi 4L Pulse receives a higher user rating of 3.8, while Rio Mobile Paris has a rating of 3.5.
|
✕
iBall Andi 4L Pulse
₹3,499
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Rio Mobile Paris
₹2,799
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
54%
|
Release Date
|
05 Jan, 2015
|
26 Mar, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 200
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
0.3 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
1500 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(114 ratings)
|
3.5/5
(141 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
218 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
64.04 %
|
Design
Height
|
N/A
|
132.4 mm
|
Width
|
N/A
|
65.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
N/A
|
8.2 mm
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1500 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 5 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v3.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|