|
52%
iBall Andi 4L Pulse
₹3,499
(Discontinued)
|
Spice Stellar 405
₹3,273
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
iBall Andi 4L Pulse vs Spice Stellar 405
Comparing the iBall Andi 4L Pulse vs Spice Stellar 405 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both iBall Andi 4L Pulse and Spice Stellar 405 run at the same processing speed of 1.2 GHz.
Display: Both iBall Andi 4L Pulse and Spice Stellar 405 offer the same screen size of 4 inches and feature the same LCD display.
Rear Camera: iBall Andi 4L Pulse offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Spice Stellar 405 offers 3.2 MP, making iBall Andi 4L Pulse better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Spice Stellar 405 offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while iBall Andi 4L Pulse offers 0.3 MP, making Spice Stellar 405 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both iBall Andi 4L Pulse and Spice Stellar 405 offer the same 1500 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Both iBall Andi 4L Pulse and Spice Stellar 405 offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: iBall Andi 4L Pulse receives a higher user rating of 3.8, while Spice Stellar 405 has a rating of 3.2.
|
iBall Andi 4L Pulse
₹3,499
(Discontinued)
|
Spice Stellar 405
₹3,273
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
05 Jan, 2015
|
05 May, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
Snapdragon 200
|
Snapdragon
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
1.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1500 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(114 ratings)
|
3.2/5
(12 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
3.2 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2048 x 1536 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1500 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 5 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v3.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|
Applications
|
N/A
|
WhatsApp
|