|
52%
iBall Andi 4L Pulse
₹3,499
(Discontinued)
|
Zen Ultrafone 303 Quad
₹2,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
iBall Andi 4L Pulse vs Zen Ultrafone 303 Quad
Comparing the iBall Andi 4L Pulse vs Zen Ultrafone 303 Quad across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Zen Ultrafone 303 Quad runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while iBall Andi 4L Pulse runs at 1.2 GHz, making Zen Ultrafone 303 Quad the better performer.
Display: Both iBall Andi 4L Pulse and Zen Ultrafone 303 Quad offer the same screen size of 4 inches and feature the same LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both iBall Andi 4L Pulse and Zen Ultrafone 303 Quad feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Zen Ultrafone 303 Quad offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while iBall Andi 4L Pulse offers 0.3 MP, making Zen Ultrafone 303 Quad better for front camera photography.
Battery: Zen Ultrafone 303 Quad offers a higher battery capacity with 1650 mAh, while iBall Andi 4L Pulse offers 1500 mAh, making Zen Ultrafone 303 Quad better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both iBall Andi 4L Pulse and Zen Ultrafone 303 Quad offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: iBall Andi 4L Pulse receives a higher user rating of 3.8, while Zen Ultrafone 303 Quad has a rating of 3.
|
✕
iBall Andi 4L Pulse
₹3,499
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Zen Ultrafone 303 Quad
₹2,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
05 Jan, 2015
|
01 Apr, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
Snapdragon 200
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
1.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1500 mAh
|
1650 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(114 ratings)
|
3/5
(7 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1500 mAh
|
1650 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v3.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|