iBall Planet 3G vs SICT Spaark

Comparing the iBall Planet 3G vs SICT Spaark across display, camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Both iBall Planet 3G and SICT Spaark offer the same screen size of 2.4 inches.

Rear Camera: iBall Planet 3G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 2 MP, while SICT Spaark offers 1.3 MP, making iBall Planet 3G better for rear camera photography.

Battery: Both iBall Planet 3G and SICT Spaark offer the same 1400 mAh battery capacity.

iBall Planet 3G

(Discontinued)

SICT Spaark

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

N/A	19 Mar, 2012

Display

2.4 inches (6.1 cm)	2.4 inches (6.1 cm)
N/A	240x320 px

Rear Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

1.3 MP

Primary Camera

Front Camera

0.3 MP

N/A

Battery

1400 mAh

User Feedback

Display

Screen Size

2.4 inches (6.1 cm)

Resolution

N/A	240x320 px

Pixel Density

N/A

167 ppi

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes	Yes Flash LED Flash

Shooting Modes

Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Front Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Front Camera

N/A

Camera Features

Fixed Focus

N/A

Battery

Capacity

1400 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 4(2G)

N/A

Storage

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 16 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Single SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 WAV AAC AMR AWB with Background Music Playback Music Play Time : Up to 3 hours

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player with Dual Speaker 20x20 mm

Sensors

Java

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes 2000 Entries Phonebook with Black List and Backup

Yes

SMS

Yes SMS Storage 1000

Yes

MMS

Yes