|
81%
iQOO Z7 Pro
₹26,999
(Out of Stock)
|
81%
Moto G84
₹19,799
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
iQOO Z7 Pro vs Moto G84
Comparing the iQOO Z7 Pro vs Moto G84 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: iQOO Z7 Pro runs at a higher processing speed of 2.8 GHz, while Moto G84 runs at 2.2 GHz, making iQOO Z7 Pro the better performer.
Display: iQOO Z7 Pro offers a screen size of 6.78 inches, while Moto G84 offers 6.55 inches, making iQOO Z7 Pro the larger display of the two. iQOO Z7 Pro features a AMOLED display compared to Moto G84's P-OLED, making iQOO Z7 Pro the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: iQOO Z7 Pro offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while Moto G84 offers 50 MP, making iQOO Z7 Pro better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both iQOO Z7 Pro and Moto G84 feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Moto G84 offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while iQOO Z7 Pro offers 4600 mAh, making Moto G84 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Moto G84 offers higher internal storage with 256 GB, while iQOO Z7 Pro offers 128 GB, making Moto G84 the better option for storage.
User Rating: iQOO Z7 Pro and Moto G84 both receive the same user rating of 4.2.
|
✕
iQOO Z7 Pro
₹26,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Moto G84
₹19,799
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
81%
|
81%
|
Release Date
|
05 Sep, 2023
|
08 Sep, 2023
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7200
|
Snapdragon 695
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.8 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
12 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.78 inches (17.22 cm)
|
6.55 inches (16.64 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
P-OLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
64 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4600 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
66W Flash Charging
|
30W Turbo Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
256 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(158 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(53,025 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
368,181
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
13h 24m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 05, 2023
(Official)
|
Sep 08, 2023
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v13.0
|
Android v13
|
OS Updates
|
2 Years
|
1 Year
|
Security Updates
|
3 Years
|
3 Years
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7200
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A715 2.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A510 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 660 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 660 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
4 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G610 MC4
|
Adreno 619
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
12 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
368,181
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
18.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
47.8 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED (Curved Display)
|
P-OLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.78 inches (17.22 cm)
|
6.55 inches (16.64 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
1300 nits
|
1300 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
388 ppi
|
402 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
90.42 %
|
87.01 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
Yes HDR 10+
|
Yes HDR 10+
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
93.3 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
164.1 mm
|
160 mm
|
Width
|
74.8 mm
|
74.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.36 mm
|
7.6 mm
|
Weight
|
175 grams
|
166.8 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Mineral Glass
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP54
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
64 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.79 Wide Angle26 mm focal length S5KGW3 ISOCELL Plus |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.88 Wide Angle1/1.5" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes Ring LED
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
Dual Video Recording
|
Dual Video Recording
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.45 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
16 MP
f/2.45 Wide Angle Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
