iQOO Neo 10R
₹23,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo T4 vs iQOO Neo 10R
Comparing the vivo T4 vs iQOO Neo 10R across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: iQOO Neo 10R scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 5,139, while vivo T4 scores 3,334, making iQOO Neo 10R the better performer.
Display: iQOO Neo 10R offers a screen size of 6.78 inches, while vivo T4 offers 6.77 inches, making iQOO Neo 10R the larger display of the two. Both vivo T4 and iQOO Neo 10R feature the same AMOLED display.
Rear Camera: Both vivo T4 and iQOO Neo 10R feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both vivo T4 and iQOO Neo 10R feature a 32 MP primary front camera.
Battery: vivo T4 delivers longer battery life with 18h 01m, while iQOO Neo 10R delivers 16h 22m, making vivo T4 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both vivo T4 and iQOO Neo 10R offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: vivo T4 receives a higher expert rating of 8.2 from the editorial team, while iQOO Neo 10R is rated 8.1.
User Rating: iQOO Neo 10R receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while vivo T4 has a rating of 4.4.
|
iQOO Neo 10R
₹23,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
85%
|
89%
|
Release Date
|
29 Apr, 2025
|
11 Mar, 2025
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
|
Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.5 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 3 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.77 inches (17.2 cm)
|
6.78 inches (17.22 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2392 px (FHD+)
|
1260x2800 px (FHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
144 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
32 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
7300 mAh
|
6400 mAh
|
|
90W Flash Charging
|
80W Flash Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.2/10
|
8.1/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(82,039 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(14,500 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
797,572
AnTuTu Score
|
1,476,651
AnTuTu Score
|
|
18h 01m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
16h 22m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹25,999
|
Not Available in any store
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Apr 29, 2025
(Official)
|
Mar 11, 2025
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v15
|
Android v15
|
OS Updates
|
2 Years
|
3 Years
|
Security Updates
|
3 Years
|
4 Years
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.5 GHz, Single core, Cortex A720 2.4 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A720 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A520 |
Octa core
3 GHz, Single core, Cortex X4 2.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A720 2 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A520 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
4 nm
|
4 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 810
|
Adreno 735
|
RAM
|
8 GB / 12 GB
|
8 GB / 12 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR5X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
797,572
|
1,476,651
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
23.0 s
|
18.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
3.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
41.2 %
|
33.1 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED (Curved Display)
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.77 inches (17.2 cm)
|
6.78 inches (17.22 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2392 px (FHD+)
|
1260x2800 px (FHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
5000 nits
|
4500 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
1300 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
144 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
388 ppi
|
453 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
88.64 %
|
89.34 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
93.4 %
|
Design
Height
|
163.4 mm
|
163.72 mm
|
Width
|
76.4 mm
|
75.88 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.89 mm
|
7.98 mm
|
Weight
|
199 grams
|
196 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP65
|
Yes Splash proof IP65
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle1/1.95" sensor size IMX882 CMOS image sensor Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.79 Wide Angle1/1.95" sensor size IMX882 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) SuperMoon |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) SuperMoon |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
4k @60 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Bokeh portrait video
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
32 MP
f/2.45 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size 0.7µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
4k @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
7300 mAh
|
6400 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 90W Flash Charging 50% in 33 minutes
|
Yes 80W Flash Charging 50% in 26 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
18h 01m
|
16h 22m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
0h 45m 0s
|
0h 43m 0s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.990 W/kg Body: 0.873 W/kg
|
Head: 0.97 W/kg Body: 0.96 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) 5GHz 6GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.2
|
Yes v5.4
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹25,999
|
Not Available in any store
|
Related Comparisons
vivo T4
vivo T5x
vivo T4
vivo T4R
vivo T4
iQOO Z10
vivo T4
vivo T4 Pro
vivo T4
vivo T4 Ultra
vivo T4
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
vivo T4
realme P4
vivo T4
OPPO K13 5G
vivo T4
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
vivo T4
vivo T5 Pro
vivo T4
vivo T4X
vivo T4
realme P4 Pro
vivo T4
vivo T3 Pro
vivo T4
iQOO Z10R
vivo T4
vivo Y400
iQOO Neo 10R
iQOO Neo 10
iQOO Neo 10R
POCO X7 Pro
iQOO Neo 10R
iQOO Z10
iQOO Neo 10R
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
iQOO Neo 10R
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
iQOO Neo 10R
OPPO K13 Turbo 5G
iQOO Neo 10R
Nothing Phone 3a
iQOO Neo 10R
iQOO Z11x
iQOO Neo 10R
iQOO Z10R
iQOO Neo 10R
vivo T4 Pro
iQOO Neo 10R
realme P3 Ultra
iQOO Neo 10R
OnePlus Nord CE 5 5G
iQOO Neo 10R
OnePlus Nord 5
iQOO Neo 10R
realme GT 7
iQOO Neo 10R
realme P4 Pro