|
79%
vivo V17
₹27,990
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
Samsung Galaxy A51
₹25,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo V17 vs Samsung Galaxy A51
Comparing the vivo V17 vs Samsung Galaxy A51 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: vivo V17 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,651, while Samsung Galaxy A51 scores 1,196, making vivo V17 the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy A51 offers a screen size of 6.5 inches, while vivo V17 offers 6.44 inches, making Samsung Galaxy A51 the larger display of the two. Both vivo V17 and Samsung Galaxy A51 feature the same Super AMOLED display.
Rear Camera: Both vivo V17 and Samsung Galaxy A51 feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both vivo V17 and Samsung Galaxy A51 feature a 32 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy A51 delivers longer battery life with 14h 29m, while vivo V17 delivers 12h 09m, making Samsung Galaxy A51 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both vivo V17 and Samsung Galaxy A51 offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: Samsung Galaxy A51 receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while vivo V17 is rated 7.
User Rating: vivo V17 receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Samsung Galaxy A51 has a rating of 4.3.
|
✕
vivo V17
₹27,990
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy A51
₹25,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
79%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
10 Dec, 2019
|
29 Jan, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 675
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.44 inches (16.36 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
12 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
5 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4500 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
15W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.0
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(13,957 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(13,353 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
227,722
AnTuTu Score
|
171,285
AnTuTu Score
|
|
12h 09m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
14h 29m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Dec 10, 2019
(Official)
|
Jan 29, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 460 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 460 |
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.7 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
10 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 612
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
227,722
|
171,285
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
26.0 s
|
29.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
11.0 %
|
8.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
33.7 %
|
32.7 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Best In Class
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.44 inches (16.36 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
405 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.99 %
|
87.44 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91.38 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
159 mm
|
158.5 mm
|
Width
|
74.1 mm
|
73.6 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.5 mm
|
7.9 mm
|
Weight
|
176 grams
|
172 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81/2" sensor size IMX582 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/2.026 mm focal length 1/2.25" sensor size S5KGM2 ISO-CELL 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
12 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
5 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.4 Primary Camera23 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
32 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1/2.8" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
No
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4500 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 32 Hours(4G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
12h 09m
|
14h 29m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 46m 18s
|
1h 35m 31s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.0
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.990 W/kg Body: 0.251 W/kg
|
Head: 0.598 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|