|
73%
vivo Z1 Pro
₹15,990
(Out of Stock)
|
69%
HTC Wildfire X 128GB
₹16,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo Z1 Pro vs HTC Wildfire X 128GB
Comparing the vivo Z1 Pro vs HTC Wildfire X 128GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: vivo Z1 Pro runs at a higher processing speed of 2.3 GHz, while HTC Wildfire X 128GB runs at 2.0 GHz, making vivo Z1 Pro the better performer.
Display: vivo Z1 Pro offers a screen size of 6.53 inches, while HTC Wildfire X 128GB offers 6.22 inches, making vivo Z1 Pro the larger display of the two. Both vivo Z1 Pro and HTC Wildfire X 128GB feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: vivo Z1 Pro offers a higher rear camera resolution with 16 MP, while HTC Wildfire X 128GB offers 12 MP, making vivo Z1 Pro better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: vivo Z1 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while HTC Wildfire X 128GB offers 8 MP, making vivo Z1 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: vivo Z1 Pro offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while HTC Wildfire X 128GB offers 3300 mAh, making vivo Z1 Pro better for longer battery life.
Storage: vivo Z1 Pro offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while HTC Wildfire X 128GB offers 128 GB, making vivo Z1 Pro the better option for storage.
User Rating: vivo Z1 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while HTC Wildfire X 128GB has a rating of 3.8.
|
✕
vivo Z1 Pro
₹15,990
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
HTC Wildfire X 128GB
₹16,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
73%
|
69%
|
Release Date
|
03 Jul, 2019
|
22 Aug, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 712
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
6.22 inches (15.8 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
12 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Telephoto Camera (upto 2x Optical Zoom)
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
3300 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
N/A
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(360,568 ratings)
|
3.8/5
(1,401 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
109,750
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 03, 2019
(Official)
|
Aug 22, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 360 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 360 |
Octa core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
10 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 616
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
3 GB / 4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
N/A
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
109,750
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
22.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
7.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
19.9 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
6.22 inches (15.8 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19:9
|
Pixel Density
|
395 ppi
|
270 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.17 %
|
81.87 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.77 %
|
88.8 %
|
Design
Height
|
162.39 mm
|
156.7 mm
|
Width
|
77.33 mm
|
74.9 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.85 mm
|
7.9 mm
|
Weight
|
201 grams
|
160 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.78 Wide Angle1/2.8" sensor size IMX499 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 1.12µm pixel size |
12 MP
Primary Camera1/2.8" sensor size 1.25µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera16 mm focal length |
8 MP
Telephoto Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
5 MP
Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Dual-color LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4616 x 3464 Pixels
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
3300 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
N/A
|
Battery Test Results
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 49m 31s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
32 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|