|
Add to Compare
|
×
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2200
Share
Based on benchmark performance, Apple A16 Bionic achieves a higher total AnTuTu score of 1,302,867 (tested by 91Mobiles), compared to Samsung Exynos 2200's 1,073,002 (tested by 91Mobiles), making Apple A16 Bionic the more powerful processor.
... read more|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
Sep, 2022
|
Jan, 2022
|
CPU
|
Hexa Core
(3.46 GHz, Dual Core + 2.02 GHz, Quad core)
|
Octa core
(2.8 GHz, Single Core + 2.52 GHz, Tri core + 1.82 GHz, Quad core)
|
Process Node
|
4 nm
|
4 nm
|
GPU
|
Apple A16 GPU
|
Xclipse 920
|
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5
|
LPDDR5
|
AnTuTu Score
|
1,302,867
|
1,073,002
|
Geekbench Score
|
2,398/5,285
|
1,573/3,873
|
Phones Powered by These SoCs
Benchmark
AnTuTu
(The higher, the better)
AnTuTu measures CPU, GPU, memory and overall performance in different scenarios
Apple A16 Bionic
1,302,867
Samsung Exynos 2200
1,073,002
CPU
322,518
315,906
GPU
353,283
373,247
Memory
310,155
164,351
UX
316,911
219,498
Geekbench
(The higher, the better)
The Geekbench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Geekbench Single Core
Apple A16 Bionic
2,398
Samsung Exynos 2200
1,573
Geekbench Multi Core
Apple A16 Bionic
5,285
Samsung Exynos 2200
3,873
Benchmark Screenshots
AnTuTu Score:
General
SoC Brand
|
Apple
|
Samsung
|
Title
|
Apple A16 Bionic
|
Samsung Exynos 2200
|
Model No
|
APL1W10
|
S5E9925
|
Manufacturing
|
TSMC
|
Samsung
|
CPU
Total Cores
|
Hexa Core
|
Octa core
|
CPU
|
Hexa Core (3.46 GHz, Dual Core, Everest + 2.02 GHz, Quad core, Sawtooth)
|
Octa core (2.8 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X2 + 2.52 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A710 + 1.82 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A510)
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Process Node
|
4 nm
|
4 nm
|
Instruction Set
|
ARMv8.6-A
|
ARMv9-A
|
L1 Cache
|
256 KB
|
N/A
|
L2 Cache
|
16 MB
|
N/A
|
L3 Cache
|
N/A
|
4 MB
|
GPU
GPU
|
Apple A16 GPU
|
Xclipse 920
|
GPU Clock speed
|
1.398 GHz
|
1.306 GHz
|
Pipelines
|
5
|
3
|
Shading Units
|
128
|
128
|
Total Shaders
|
640
|
384
|
FLOPS
|
1789.4 Gigaflops
|
1003 Gigaflops
|
Vulkan Version
|
N/A
|
1.3
|
OpenCL Version
|
N/A
|
2.0 FP
|
DirectX Version
|
N/A
|
12.1
|
AI
NPU
|
Neural Engine
|
N/A
|
Memory
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5
|
LPDDR5
|
Memory Speed
|
3.2 GHz
|
3.2 GHz
|
Bus
|
4x16 Bit
|
4x16 Bit
|
Memory Max bandwidth
|
51.2 Gb/s
|
51.2 Gb/s
|
Memory Max size
|
6 GB
|
24 GB
|
Storage Type
|
NVMe
|
UFS 3.1
|
Camera
Max Camera Sensor Supported
|
48 MP
|
200 MP
|
Max Video Capture Resolution
|
UHD @ 60 FPS
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
Display
Max On-Device Display Resolution
|
N/A
|
UHD @ 120 Hz
|
Max Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
144 Hz
|
Multimedia
Video Playback Resolution
|
UHD @ 60 FPS
|
8K @ 60 FPS
|
Video Codecs
|
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
|
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
|
Audio Codecs
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
Connectivity
Modem Name
|
N/A
|
Exynos 5300
|
5G Support
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Peak Download Speed
|
Up to 7500 Mbps
|
Up to 7350 Mbps
|
Peak Upload Speed
|
Up to 3500 Mbps
|
Up to 3670 Mbps
|
Wi-Fi Version
|
6
|
6
|
Wi-Fi Standard
|
a, ax, b, g, n, n 5GHz
|
a, ac, ax, b, g, n, n 5GHz
|
Bluetooth Version
|
5.3
|
5.2
|
Navigation
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, QZSS
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC
|
User Feedback
Related Comparisons
Apple A16 Bionic
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Apple A16 Bionic
Google Tensor G5
Apple A16 Bionic
Apple A17 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic
Samsung Exynos 2500
Apple A16 Bionic
Google Tensor G4
Samsung Exynos 2200
Google Tensor G4
Samsung Exynos 2200
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
Samsung Exynos 2200
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
Samsung Exynos 2200
Google Tensor G3
Samsung Exynos 2200
MediaTek Dimensity 9000