|
Add to Compare
|
×
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 2200
Share
Based on benchmark performance, Samsung Exynos 2200 achieves a higher total AnTuTu score of 1,073,002 (tested by 91Mobiles), compared to Google Tensor's 717,872 (tested by 91Mobiles), making Samsung Exynos 2200 the more powerful processor.
... read more|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
Oct, 2021
|
Jan, 2022
|
CPU
|
Octa core
(2.8 GHz, Dual Core + 2.25 GHz, Dual core + 1.8 GHz, Quad core)
|
Octa core
(2.8 GHz, Single Core + 2.52 GHz, Tri core + 1.82 GHz, Quad core)
|
Process Node
|
5 nm
|
4 nm
|
GPU
|
Mali-G78 MP20
|
Xclipse 920
|
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5
|
LPDDR5
|
AnTuTu Score
|
717,872
|
1,073,002
|
Geekbench Score
|
1,039/2,817
|
1,573/3,873
|
Phones Powered by These SoCs
Benchmark
AnTuTu
(The higher, the better)
AnTuTu measures CPU, GPU, memory and overall performance in different scenarios
Google Tensor
717,872
Samsung Exynos 2200
1,073,002
CPU
187,698
315,906
GPU
298,218
373,247
Memory
100,887
164,351
UX
137,683
219,498
Geekbench
(The higher, the better)
The Geekbench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Geekbench Single Core
Google Tensor
1,039
Samsung Exynos 2200
1,573
Geekbench Multi Core
Google Tensor
2,817
Samsung Exynos 2200
3,873
Benchmark Screenshots
AnTuTu Score:
There are no benchmark screenshots available for the processor.
There are no benchmark screenshots available for the processor.
General
SoC Brand
|
Google
|
Samsung
|
Title
|
Google Tensor
|
Samsung Exynos 2200
|
Model No
|
GS101
|
S5E9925
|
Manufacturing
|
Samsung
|
Samsung
|
CPU
Total Cores
|
Octa core
|
Octa core
|
CPU
|
Octa core (2.8 GHz, Dual Core, Cortex X1 + 2.25 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 + 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55)
|
Octa core (2.8 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X2 + 2.52 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A710 + 1.82 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A510)
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Process Node
|
5 nm
|
4 nm
|
Instruction Set
|
ARMv8.2-A
|
ARMv9-A
|
L2 Cache
|
3 MB
|
N/A
|
L3 Cache
|
4 MB
|
4 MB
|
GPU
GPU
|
Mali-G78 MP20
|
Xclipse 920
|
GPU Clock speed
|
850 MHz
|
1.306 GHz
|
Pipelines
|
20
|
3
|
Shading Units
|
32
|
128
|
Total Shaders
|
640
|
384
|
FLOPS
|
1085.4 Gigaflops
|
1003 Gigaflops
|
Vulkan Version
|
1.3
|
1.3
|
OpenCL Version
|
2.0 FP
|
2.0 FP
|
DirectX Version
|
N/A
|
12.1
|
Memory
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5
|
LPDDR5
|
Memory Speed
|
3.2 GHz
|
3.2 GHz
|
Bus
|
4x16 Bit
|
4x16 Bit
|
Memory Max bandwidth
|
51.2 Gb/s
|
51.2 Gb/s
|
Memory Max size
|
12 GB
|
24 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 3.1
|
UFS 3.1
|
Camera
Max Camera Sensor Supported
|
200 MP
|
200 MP
|
Max Video Capture Resolution
|
UHD @ 60 FPS
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
Display
Max On-Device Display Resolution
|
UHD
|
UHD @ 120 Hz
|
Max Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
144 Hz
|
Multimedia
Video Playback Resolution
|
UHD @ 60 FPS
|
8K @ 60 FPS
|
Video Codecs
|
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
|
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
|
Audio Codecs
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
Connectivity
Modem Name
|
Exynos 5300b
|
Exynos 5300
|
5G Support
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Peak Download Speed
|
Up to 7350 Mbps
|
Up to 7350 Mbps
|
Peak Upload Speed
|
Up to 3670 Mbps
|
Up to 3670 Mbps
|
Wi-Fi Version
|
6
|
6
|
Wi-Fi Standard
|
a, ac, ax, g, n, n 5GHz
|
a, ac, ax, b, g, n, n 5GHz
|
Bluetooth Version
|
5.2
|
5.2
|
Navigation
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, QZSS
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC
|
User Feedback
Related Comparisons
Google Tensor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
Google Tensor
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
Google Tensor
Google Tensor G3
Google Tensor
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Google Tensor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Samsung Exynos 2200
Google Tensor G4
Samsung Exynos 2200
Apple A16 Bionic
Samsung Exynos 2200
Apple A15 Bionic
Samsung Exynos 2200
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
Samsung Exynos 2200
MediaTek Dimensity 9200