|
Add to Compare
|
×
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Exynos 1680 vs Google Tensor G4
Share
Based on benchmark performance, Google Tensor G4 achieves a higher total AnTuTu score of 1,400,792 (tested by 91Mobiles), compared to Samsung Exynos 1680's 1,392,494 (tested by 91Mobiles), making Google Tensor G4 the more powerful processor.
... read more|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
Mar, 2026
|
Aug, 2024
|
CPU
|
Octa core
(2.9 GHz, Single Core + 2.6 GHz, Quad core + 1.95 GHz, Tri core)
|
Octa core
(3.1 GHz, Single Core + 2.6 GHz, Tri core + 1.92 GHz, Quad core)
|
Process Node
|
4 nm
|
4 nm
|
GPU
|
Xclipse 550
|
Mali-G715 MP7
|
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5X
|
AnTuTu Score
|
1,392,494
|
1,400,792
|
Geekbench Score
|
1,382/4,540
|
1,980/4,757
|
Phones Powered by These SoCs
View More
Benchmark
AnTuTu
(The higher, the better)
AnTuTu measures CPU, GPU, memory and overall performance in different scenarios
Samsung Exynos 1680
1,392,494
Google Tensor G4
1,400,792
CPU
515,439
468,536
GPU
383,216
407,988
Memory
202,958
232,299
UX
290,881
291,969
Geekbench
(The higher, the better)
The Geekbench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Geekbench Single Core
Samsung Exynos 1680
1,382
Google Tensor G4
1,980
Geekbench Multi Core
Samsung Exynos 1680
4,540
Google Tensor G4
4,757
Benchmark Screenshots
AnTuTu Score:
General
SoC Brand
|
Samsung
|
Google
|
Title
|
Samsung Exynos 1680
|
Google Tensor G4
|
Model No
|
S5E8865
|
GS401
|
Manufacturing
|
Samsung
|
Samsung
|
CPU
Total Cores
|
Octa core
|
Octa core
|
CPU
|
Octa core (2.9 GHz, Single Core, Cortex A720 + 2.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A720 + 1.95 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A520)
|
Octa core (3.1 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X4 + 2.6 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A720 + 1.92 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A520)
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Process Node
|
4 nm
|
4 nm
|
Instruction Set
|
ARMv9.2-A
|
ARMv9.2-A
|
GPU
GPU
|
Xclipse 550
|
Mali-G715 MP7
|
GPU Clock speed
|
1.2 GHz
|
940 MHz
|
Pipelines
|
2
|
7
|
Shading Units
|
128
|
128
|
Total Shaders
|
256
|
896
|
FLOPS
|
1228.8 Gigaflops
|
1684.4 Gigaflops
|
Vulkan Version
|
1.4
|
1.3
|
OpenCL Version
|
3.0 FP
|
2.0 FP
|
DirectX Version
|
12.1
|
N/A
|
AI
NPU
|
AI Engine
|
N/A
|
Memory
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5X
|
Memory Speed
|
N/A
|
4.266 GHz
|
Bus
|
2x16 Bit
|
4x16 Bit
|
Memory Max bandwidth
|
N/A
|
68.2 Gb/s
|
Memory Max size
|
12 GB
|
16 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 4.1
|
UFS 4.0
|
Camera
Max Camera Sensor Supported
|
200 MP
|
N/A
|
Max Video Capture Resolution
|
UHD @ 60 FPS
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
Display
Max On-Device Display Resolution
|
QHD+
|
3840x2400
|
Max Refresh Rate
|
144 Hz
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Video Playback Resolution
|
UHD @ 60 FPS
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
Video Codecs
|
H.264 (AVC), H.264, H.265 (HEVC), H.265, VP8, VP9
|
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
|
Audio Codecs
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
Connectivity
Modem Name
|
N/A
|
Exynos 5400c
|
5G Support
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Peak Download Speed
|
Up to 5100 Mbps
|
N/A
|
Peak Upload Speed
|
Up to 1280 Mbps
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi Version
|
6E
|
7
|
Wi-Fi Standard
|
ax, ax 6GHz
|
a, ac, ax, b, be, g, n, n 5GHz
|
Bluetooth Version
|
6.1
|
6.0
|
Navigation
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, QZSS
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, QZSS
|
User Feedback
Related Comparisons
Samsung Exynos 1680
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 1680
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
Samsung Exynos 1680
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3
Samsung Exynos 1680
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Extreme Edition
Samsung Exynos 1680
MediaTek Dimensity 8350
Google Tensor G4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Google Tensor G4
Google Tensor G5
Google Tensor G4
Apple A17 Pro
Google Tensor G4
Samsung Exynos 2500
Google Tensor G4
Apple A16 Bionic