Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Apple A16 Bionic

Based on benchmark performance, Apple A16 Bionic achieves a higher total AnTuTu score of 1,302,867 (tested by 91Mobiles), compared to Samsung Exynos 2200's 1,073,002 (tested by 91Mobiles), making Apple A16 Bionic the more powerful processor.

Samsung Exynos 2200

Apple A16 Bionic

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

Jan, 2022

Sep, 2022

CPU

Octa core

(2.8 GHz, Single Core + 2.52 GHz, Tri core + 1.82 GHz, Quad core)

Hexa Core

(3.46 GHz, Dual Core + 2.02 GHz, Quad core)

Process Node

4 nm

GPU

Xclipse 920

Apple A16 GPU

Memory Type

LPDDR5

AnTuTu Score

1,073,002

View Benchmark Details

1,302,867

View Benchmark Details

Geekbench Score

1,573/3,873

View Benchmark Details

2,398/5,285

View Benchmark Details

Phones Powered by These SoCs

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Score: 945,794

₹134,900

Benchmark

AnTuTu (The higher, the better)

AnTuTu measures CPU, GPU, memory and overall performance in different scenarios

Samsung Exynos 2200 1,073,002

View Benchmark Details

Apple A16 Bionic 1,302,867

View Benchmark Details

CPU

315,906

322,518

GPU

373,247

353,283

Memory

164,351

310,155

219,498

316,911

Geekbench (The higher, the better)

The Geekbench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance

Geekbench Single Core

Samsung Exynos 2200 1,573

View Benchmark Details

Apple A16 Bionic 2,398

View Benchmark Details

Geekbench Multi Core

Samsung Exynos 2200 3,873

View Benchmark Details

Apple A16 Bionic 5,285

View Benchmark Details

Benchmark Screenshots

AnTuTu Score:

General

SoC Brand

Samsung

Apple

Title

Samsung Exynos 2200

Apple A16 Bionic

Model No

S5E9925

APL1W10

Manufacturing

Samsung

TSMC

CPU

Total Cores

Octa core

Hexa Core

CPU

Octa core (2.8 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X2 + 2.52 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A710 + 1.82 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A510)

Hexa Core (3.46 GHz, Dual Core, Everest + 2.02 GHz, Quad core, Sawtooth)

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit

Process Node

4 nm

Instruction Set

ARMv9-A

ARMv8.6-A

L1 Cache

N/A

256 KB

L2 Cache

N/A

16 MB

L3 Cache

4 MB

N/A

GPU

Xclipse 920

Apple A16 GPU

GPU Clock speed

1.306 GHz

1.398 GHz

Pipelines

Shading Units

128

Total Shaders

384

640

FLOPS

1003 Gigaflops

1789.4 Gigaflops

Vulkan Version

1.3

N/A

OpenCL Version

2.0 FP

N/A

DirectX Version

12.1

N/A

AI

NPU

N/A	Neural Engine

Memory

Memory Type

LPDDR5

Memory Speed

3.2 GHz

Bus

4x16 Bit

Memory Max bandwidth

51.2 Gb/s

Memory Max size

24 GB

6 GB

Storage Type

UFS 3.1

NVMe

Camera

Max Camera Sensor Supported

200 MP

48 MP

Max Video Capture Resolution

8K @ 30 FPS

UHD @ 60 FPS

Display

Max On-Device Display Resolution

UHD @ 120 Hz

N/A

Max Refresh Rate

144 Hz

N/A

Multimedia

Video Playback Resolution

8K @ 60 FPS

UHD @ 60 FPS

Video Codecs

H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9

H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9

Audio Codecs

AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem Name

Exynos 5300

N/A

5G Support

Yes

Peak Download Speed

Up to 7350 Mbps

Up to 7500 Mbps

Peak Upload Speed

Up to 3670 Mbps

Up to 3500 Mbps

Wi-Fi Version

Wi-Fi Standard

a, ac, ax, b, g, n, n 5GHz

a, ax, b, g, n, n 5GHz

Bluetooth Version

5.2

5.3

Navigation

BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC

BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, QZSS

User Feedback

Related Comparisons

Samsung Exynos 2200

Google Tensor G4

Samsung Exynos 2200

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1

Samsung Exynos 2200

MediaTek Dimensity 9200

Samsung Exynos 2200

Google Tensor G3

Samsung Exynos 2200

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

Apple A16 Bionic

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

Apple A16 Bionic

Google Tensor G5

Apple A16 Bionic

Apple A17 Pro

Apple A16 Bionic

Samsung Exynos 2500

Apple A16 Bionic

Google Tensor G4