|
Add to Compare
|
×
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Google Tensor G4
Share
Based on benchmark performance, Google Tensor G4 achieves a higher total AnTuTu score of 1,400,792 (tested by 91Mobiles), compared to Samsung Exynos 2200's 1,073,002 (tested by 91Mobiles), making Google Tensor G4 the more powerful processor.
... read more|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
Jan, 2022
|
Aug, 2024
|
CPU
|
Octa core
(2.8 GHz, Single Core + 2.52 GHz, Tri core + 1.82 GHz, Quad core)
|
Octa core
(3.1 GHz, Single Core + 2.6 GHz, Tri core + 1.92 GHz, Quad core)
|
Process Node
|
4 nm
|
4 nm
|
GPU
|
Xclipse 920
|
Mali-G715 MP7
|
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5
|
LPDDR5X
|
AnTuTu Score
|
1,073,002
|
1,400,792
|
Geekbench Score
|
1,573/3,873
|
1,980/4,757
|
Phones Powered by These SoCs
View More
Benchmark
AnTuTu
(The higher, the better)
AnTuTu measures CPU, GPU, memory and overall performance in different scenarios
Samsung Exynos 2200
1,073,002
Google Tensor G4
1,400,792
CPU
315,906
468,536
GPU
373,247
407,988
Memory
164,351
232,299
UX
219,498
291,969
Geekbench
(The higher, the better)
The Geekbench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Geekbench Single Core
Samsung Exynos 2200
1,573
Google Tensor G4
1,980
Geekbench Multi Core
Samsung Exynos 2200
3,873
Google Tensor G4
4,757
Benchmark Screenshots
AnTuTu Score:
General
SoC Brand
|
Samsung
|
Google
|
Title
|
Samsung Exynos 2200
|
Google Tensor G4
|
Model No
|
S5E9925
|
GS401
|
Manufacturing
|
Samsung
|
Samsung
|
CPU
Total Cores
|
Octa core
|
Octa core
|
CPU
|
Octa core (2.8 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X2 + 2.52 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A710 + 1.82 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A510)
|
Octa core (3.1 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X4 + 2.6 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A720 + 1.92 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A520)
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Process Node
|
4 nm
|
4 nm
|
Instruction Set
|
ARMv9-A
|
ARMv9.2-A
|
L3 Cache
|
4 MB
|
N/A
|
GPU
GPU
|
Xclipse 920
|
Mali-G715 MP7
|
GPU Clock speed
|
1.306 GHz
|
940 MHz
|
Pipelines
|
3
|
7
|
Shading Units
|
128
|
128
|
Total Shaders
|
384
|
896
|
FLOPS
|
1003 Gigaflops
|
1684.4 Gigaflops
|
Vulkan Version
|
1.3
|
1.3
|
OpenCL Version
|
2.0 FP
|
2.0 FP
|
DirectX Version
|
12.1
|
N/A
|
Memory
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5
|
LPDDR5X
|
Memory Speed
|
3.2 GHz
|
4.266 GHz
|
Bus
|
4x16 Bit
|
4x16 Bit
|
Memory Max bandwidth
|
51.2 Gb/s
|
68.2 Gb/s
|
Memory Max size
|
24 GB
|
16 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 3.1
|
UFS 4.0
|
Camera
Max Camera Sensor Supported
|
200 MP
|
N/A
|
Max Video Capture Resolution
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
Display
Max On-Device Display Resolution
|
UHD @ 120 Hz
|
3840x2400
|
Max Refresh Rate
|
144 Hz
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Video Playback Resolution
|
8K @ 60 FPS
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
Video Codecs
|
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
|
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
|
Audio Codecs
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
Connectivity
Modem Name
|
Exynos 5300
|
Exynos 5400c
|
5G Support
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Peak Download Speed
|
Up to 7350 Mbps
|
N/A
|
Peak Upload Speed
|
Up to 3670 Mbps
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi Version
|
6
|
7
|
Wi-Fi Standard
|
a, ac, ax, b, g, n, n 5GHz
|
a, ac, ax, b, be, g, n, n 5GHz
|
Bluetooth Version
|
5.2
|
6.0
|
Navigation
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, QZSS
|
User Feedback
Related Comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2200
Apple A16 Bionic
Samsung Exynos 2200
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
Samsung Exynos 2200
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
Samsung Exynos 2200
Google Tensor G3
Samsung Exynos 2200
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Google Tensor G4
Apple A18 Pro
Google Tensor G4
Samsung Exynos 2400
Google Tensor G4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Google Tensor G4
Google Tensor G5
Google Tensor G4
Apple A17 Pro