|
Add to Compare
|
×
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Apple A16 Bionic
Share
Based on benchmark performance, Samsung Exynos 2400 achieves a higher total AnTuTu score of 1,727,225 (tested by 91Mobiles), compared to Apple A16 Bionic's 1,302,867 (tested by 91Mobiles), making Samsung Exynos 2400 the more powerful processor.
... read more|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
Jan, 2024
|
Sep, 2022
|
CPU
|
Deca Core
(3.21 GHz, Single Core + 2.9 GHz, Dual core + 2.6 GHz, Tri core + 1.95 GHz, Quad core)
|
Hexa Core
(3.46 GHz, Dual Core + 2.02 GHz, Quad core)
|
Process Node
|
4 nm
|
4 nm
|
GPU
|
Xclipse 940
|
Apple A16 GPU
|
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5
|
AnTuTu Score
|
1,727,225
|
1,302,867
|
Geekbench Score
|
2,130/6,557
|
2,398/5,285
|
Phones Powered by These SoCs
Benchmark
AnTuTu
(The higher, the better)
AnTuTu measures CPU, GPU, memory and overall performance in different scenarios
Samsung Exynos 2400
1,727,225
Apple A16 Bionic
1,302,867
CPU
401,042
322,518
GPU
686,186
353,283
Memory
346,988
310,155
UX
293,009
316,911
Geekbench
(The higher, the better)
The Geekbench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Geekbench Single Core
Samsung Exynos 2400
2,130
Apple A16 Bionic
2,398
Geekbench Multi Core
Samsung Exynos 2400
6,557
Apple A16 Bionic
5,285
Benchmark Screenshots
AnTuTu Score:
General
SoC Brand
|
Samsung
|
Apple
|
Title
|
Samsung Exynos 2400
|
Apple A16 Bionic
|
Model No
|
S5E9945
|
APL1W10
|
Manufacturing
|
Samsung
|
TSMC
|
CPU
Total Cores
|
Deca Core
|
Hexa Core
|
CPU
|
Deca Core (3.21 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X4 + 2.9 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A720 + 2.6 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A720 + 1.95 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A520)
|
Hexa Core (3.46 GHz, Dual Core, Everest + 2.02 GHz, Quad core, Sawtooth)
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Process Node
|
4 nm
|
4 nm
|
Instruction Set
|
ARMv9.2-A
|
ARMv8.6-A
|
L1 Cache
|
N/A
|
256 KB
|
L2 Cache
|
N/A
|
16 MB
|
L3 Cache
|
8 MB
|
N/A
|
GPU
GPU
|
Xclipse 940
|
Apple A16 GPU
|
GPU Clock speed
|
1.095 GHz
|
1.398 GHz
|
Pipelines
|
6
|
5
|
Shading Units
|
128
|
128
|
Total Shaders
|
768
|
640
|
FLOPS
|
3406.8 Gigaflops
|
1789.4 Gigaflops
|
Vulkan Version
|
1.3
|
N/A
|
OpenCL Version
|
2.0 FP
|
N/A
|
DirectX Version
|
12.1
|
N/A
|
AI
NPU
|
N/A
|
Neural Engine
|
Memory
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5
|
Memory Speed
|
4.2 GHz
|
3.2 GHz
|
Bus
|
4x16 Bit
|
4x16 Bit
|
Memory Max bandwidth
|
68.2 Gb/s
|
51.2 Gb/s
|
Memory Max size
|
24 GB
|
6 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 4.0
|
NVMe
|
Camera
Max Camera Sensor Supported
|
320 MP
|
48 MP
|
Max Video Capture Resolution
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
UHD @ 60 FPS
|
Video Capture Formats
|
MP4, MOV
|
N/A
|
Display
Max On-Device Display Resolution
|
3840x2400
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Video Playback Resolution
|
8K @ 60 FPS
|
UHD @ 60 FPS
|
Video Codecs
|
H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9
|
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
|
Audio Codecs
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
Connectivity
Modem Name
|
Exynos 5400
|
N/A
|
5G Support
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Peak Download Speed
|
Up to 12100 Mbps
|
Up to 7500 Mbps
|
Peak Upload Speed
|
Up to 3670 Mbps
|
Up to 3500 Mbps
|
Wi-Fi Version
|
6
|
6
|
Wi-Fi Standard
|
ax
|
a, ax, b, g, n, n 5GHz
|
Bluetooth Version
|
5.3
|
5.3
|
Navigation
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, QZSS
|
User Feedback
Related Comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Samsung Exynos 2400
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
Samsung Exynos 2400
Apple A18 Pro
Samsung Exynos 2400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Samsung Exynos 2400
Google Tensor G5
Apple A16 Bionic
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Apple A16 Bionic
Google Tensor G5
Apple A16 Bionic
Apple A17 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic
Samsung Exynos 2500
Apple A16 Bionic
Google Tensor G4