|
Add to Compare
|
×
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Exynos 2400e vs Apple A16 Bionic
Share
Based on benchmark performance, Samsung Exynos 2400e achieves a higher total AnTuTu score of 1,625,873 (tested by 91Mobiles), compared to Apple A16 Bionic's 1,302,867 (tested by 91Mobiles), making Samsung Exynos 2400e the more powerful processor.
... read more|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
Sep, 2024
|
Sep, 2022
|
CPU
|
Deca Core
(3.11 GHz, Single Core + 2.9 GHz, Dual core + 2.6 GHz, Tri core + 1.95 GHz, Quad core)
|
Hexa Core
(3.46 GHz, Dual Core + 2.02 GHz, Quad core)
|
Process Node
|
4 nm
|
4 nm
|
GPU
|
Xclipse 940
|
Apple A16 GPU
|
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5
|
AnTuTu Score
|
1,625,873
|
1,302,867
|
Geekbench Score
|
2,074/6,407
|
2,398/5,285
|
Phones Powered by These SoCs
Benchmark
AnTuTu
(The higher, the better)
AnTuTu measures CPU, GPU, memory and overall performance in different scenarios
Samsung Exynos 2400e
1,625,873
Apple A16 Bionic
1,302,867
CPU
400,082
322,518
GPU
698,721
353,283
Memory
238,234
310,155
UX
288,836
316,911
Geekbench
(The higher, the better)
The Geekbench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Geekbench Single Core
Samsung Exynos 2400e
2,074
Apple A16 Bionic
2,398
Geekbench Multi Core
Samsung Exynos 2400e
6,407
Apple A16 Bionic
5,285
Benchmark Screenshots
AnTuTu Score:
General
SoC Brand
|
Samsung
|
Apple
|
Title
|
Samsung Exynos 2400e
|
Apple A16 Bionic
|
Model No
|
N/A
|
APL1W10
|
Manufacturing
|
Samsung
|
TSMC
|
CPU
Total Cores
|
Deca Core
|
Hexa Core
|
CPU
|
Deca Core (3.11 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X4 + 2.9 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A720 + 2.6 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A720 + 1.95 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A520)
|
Hexa Core (3.46 GHz, Dual Core, Everest + 2.02 GHz, Quad core, Sawtooth)
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Process Node
|
4 nm
|
4 nm
|
Instruction Set
|
ARMv9.2-A
|
ARMv8.6-A
|
L1 Cache
|
N/A
|
256 KB
|
L2 Cache
|
N/A
|
16 MB
|
L3 Cache
|
8 MB
|
N/A
|
GPU
GPU
|
Xclipse 940
|
Apple A16 GPU
|
GPU Clock speed
|
1.095 GHz
|
1.398 GHz
|
Pipelines
|
6
|
5
|
Shading Units
|
128
|
128
|
Total Shaders
|
768
|
640
|
FLOPS
|
3406.8 Gigaflops
|
1789.4 Gigaflops
|
Vulkan Version
|
1.3
|
N/A
|
OpenCL Version
|
3.0 FP
|
N/A
|
DirectX Version
|
12.1
|
N/A
|
AI
NPU
|
N/A
|
Neural Engine
|
Memory
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5
|
Memory Speed
|
4.2 GHz
|
3.2 GHz
|
Bus
|
4x16 Bit
|
4x16 Bit
|
Memory Max bandwidth
|
68.2 Gb/s
|
51.2 Gb/s
|
Memory Max size
|
24 GB
|
6 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 4.0
|
NVMe
|
Camera
Max Camera Sensor Supported
|
320 MP
|
48 MP
|
Max Video Capture Resolution
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
UHD @ 60 FPS
|
Multimedia
Video Playback Resolution
|
8K @ 60 FPS
|
UHD @ 60 FPS
|
Video Codecs
|
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
|
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
|
Audio Codecs
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
Connectivity
Modem Name
|
Exynos 5400
|
N/A
|
5G Support
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Peak Download Speed
|
Up to 9640 Mbps
|
Up to 7500 Mbps
|
Peak Upload Speed
|
Up to 2550 Mbps
|
Up to 3500 Mbps
|
Wi-Fi Version
|
6
|
6
|
Wi-Fi Standard
|
ax
|
a, ax, b, g, n, n 5GHz
|
Bluetooth Version
|
5.3
|
5.3
|
Navigation
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, QZSS
|
User Feedback
Related Comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2400e
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Samsung Exynos 2400e
Apple A19
Samsung Exynos 2400e
MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
Samsung Exynos 2400e
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
Samsung Exynos 2400e
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Apple A16 Bionic
Google Tensor G5
Apple A16 Bionic
Apple A17 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic
Samsung Exynos 2500
Apple A16 Bionic
Google Tensor G4
Apple A16 Bionic
Apple A15 Bionic