|
Add to Compare
|
×
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Apple A18 Pro
Share
Based on benchmark performance, Apple A18 Pro achieves a higher total AnTuTu score of 1,774,620 (tested by 91Mobiles), compared to Samsung Exynos 2500's 1,515,751 (tested by 91Mobiles), making Apple A18 Pro the more powerful processor.
... read more|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
Jun, 2025
|
Sep, 2024
|
CPU
|
Deca Core
(3.3 GHz, Single Core + 2.74 GHz, Dual core + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core + 1.8 GHz, Dual core)
|
Hexa Core
(4.05 GHz, Dual Core + 2.42 GHz, Quad core)
|
Process Node
|
3 nm
|
3 nm
|
GPU
|
Xclipse 950
|
Apple A18 Pro GPU
|
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5X
|
AnTuTu Score
|
1,515,751
|
1,774,620
|
Geekbench Score
|
2,064/7,609
|
3,317/8,115
|
Phones Powered by These SoCs
Benchmark
AnTuTu
(The higher, the better)
AnTuTu measures CPU, GPU, memory and overall performance in different scenarios
Samsung Exynos 2500
1,515,751
Apple A18 Pro
1,774,620
CPU
379,701
474,300
GPU
529,745
646,461
Memory
360,939
292,188
UX
245,366
361,671
Geekbench
(The higher, the better)
The Geekbench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Geekbench Single Core
Samsung Exynos 2500
2,064
Apple A18 Pro
3,317
Geekbench Multi Core
Samsung Exynos 2500
7,609
Apple A18 Pro
8,115
Benchmark Screenshots
AnTuTu Score:
General
SoC Brand
|
Samsung
|
Apple
|
Title
|
Samsung Exynos 2500
|
Apple A18 Pro
|
Model No
|
S5E9955
|
APL1V07
|
Manufacturing
|
Samsung
|
TSMC
|
CPU
Total Cores
|
Deca Core
|
Hexa Core
|
CPU
|
Deca Core (3.3 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X925 + 2.74 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A725 + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core, Cortex A725 + 1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A520)
|
Hexa Core (4.05 GHz, Dual Core, Everest + 2.42 GHz, Quad core, Sawtooth)
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Process Node
|
3 nm
|
3 nm
|
Instruction Set
|
ARMv9.2-A
|
ARMv9.2-A
|
L1 Cache
|
128 KB
|
192 KB
|
L2 Cache
|
3 MB
|
16 MB
|
L3 Cache
|
16 MB
|
N/A
|
GPU
GPU
|
Xclipse 950
|
Apple A18 Pro GPU
|
GPU Clock speed
|
999 MHz
|
1.49 GHz
|
Pipelines
|
8
|
6
|
Shading Units
|
128
|
128
|
Total Shaders
|
1024
|
768
|
FLOPS
|
4091.9 Gigaflops
|
2289 Gigaflops
|
Vulkan Version
|
1.4
|
N/A
|
OpenCL Version
|
3.0 FP
|
N/A
|
DirectX Version
|
12.1
|
N/A
|
AI
NPU
|
N/A
|
Neural Engine
|
Memory
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5X
|
Memory Speed
|
4.8 GHz
|
3.75 GHz
|
Bus
|
4x16 Bit
|
4x16 Bit
|
Memory Max bandwidth
|
76.8 Gb/s
|
60 Gb/s
|
Memory Max size
|
24 GB
|
8 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 4.0
|
NVMe
|
Camera
Max Camera Sensor Supported
|
320 MP
|
48 MP
|
Max Video Capture Resolution
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
UHD @ 120 FPS
|
Display
Max On-Device Display Resolution
|
UHD
|
N/A
|
Max Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Video Playback Resolution
|
8K @ 60 FPS
|
UHD @ 120 FPS
|
Video Codecs
|
H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9
|
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9
|
Audio Codecs
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
Connectivity
Modem Name
|
Exynos 5400
|
Snapdragon X71 5G
|
5G Support
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Peak Download Speed
|
Up to 12100 Mbps
|
Up to 10000 Mbps
|
Peak Upload Speed
|
Up to 3670 Mbps
|
Up to 3500 Mbps
|
Wi-Fi Version
|
7
|
7
|
Wi-Fi Standard
|
ac, ax, b, be, g, n, n 5GHz
|
a, ac, ax, b, be, g, n, n 5GHz
|
Bluetooth Version
|
5.4
|
5.3
|
Navigation
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS
|
User Feedback
Related Comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2500
Samsung Exynos 2400
Samsung Exynos 2500
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Samsung Exynos 2500
Google Tensor G5
Samsung Exynos 2500
Apple A17 Pro
Samsung Exynos 2500
Google Tensor G4
Apple A18 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Apple A18 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
Apple A18 Pro
Samsung Exynos 2400
Apple A18 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Apple A18 Pro
Google Tensor G5