Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Google Tensor G4

Based on benchmark performance, Samsung Exynos 2500 achieves a higher total AnTuTu score of 1,515,751 (tested by 91Mobiles), compared to Google Tensor G4's 1,400,792 (tested by 91Mobiles), making Samsung Exynos 2500 the more powerful processor.

Samsung Exynos 2500

Google Tensor G4

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

Jun, 2025

Aug, 2024

CPU

Deca Core

(3.3 GHz, Single Core + 2.74 GHz, Dual core + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core + 1.8 GHz, Dual core)

Octa core

(3.1 GHz, Single Core + 2.6 GHz, Tri core + 1.92 GHz, Quad core)

Process Node

3 nm

4 nm

GPU

Xclipse 950

Mali-G715 MP7

Memory Type

LPDDR5X

AnTuTu Score

1,515,751

View Benchmark Details

1,400,792

View Benchmark Details

Geekbench Score

2,064/7,609

View Benchmark Details

1,980/4,757

View Benchmark Details

Phones Powered by These SoCs

Samsung Galaxy S26 FE

Score: N/A

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

Benchmark

AnTuTu (The higher, the better)

AnTuTu measures CPU, GPU, memory and overall performance in different scenarios

Samsung Exynos 2500 1,515,751

View Benchmark Details

Google Tensor G4 1,400,792

View Benchmark Details

CPU

379,701

468,536

GPU

529,745

407,988

Memory

360,939

232,299

245,366

291,969

Geekbench (The higher, the better)

The Geekbench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance

Geekbench Single Core

Samsung Exynos 2500 2,064

View Benchmark Details

Google Tensor G4 1,980

View Benchmark Details

Geekbench Multi Core

Samsung Exynos 2500 7,609

View Benchmark Details

Google Tensor G4 4,757

View Benchmark Details

Benchmark Screenshots

AnTuTu Score:

General

SoC Brand

Samsung

Google

Title

Samsung Exynos 2500

Google Tensor G4

Model No

S5E9955

GS401

Manufacturing

Samsung

CPU

Total Cores

Deca Core

Octa core

CPU

Deca Core (3.3 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X925 + 2.74 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A725 + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core, Cortex A725 + 1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A520)

Octa core (3.1 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X4 + 2.6 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A720 + 1.92 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A520)

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit

Process Node

3 nm

4 nm

Instruction Set

ARMv9.2-A

L1 Cache

128 KB

N/A

L2 Cache

3 MB

N/A

L3 Cache

16 MB

N/A

GPU

Xclipse 950

Mali-G715 MP7

GPU Clock speed

999 MHz

940 MHz

Pipelines

Shading Units

128

Total Shaders

1024

896

FLOPS

4091.9 Gigaflops

1684.4 Gigaflops

Vulkan Version

1.4

1.3

OpenCL Version

3.0 FP

2.0 FP

DirectX Version

12.1

N/A

Memory

Memory Type

LPDDR5X

Memory Speed

4.8 GHz

4.266 GHz

Bus

4x16 Bit

Memory Max bandwidth

76.8 Gb/s

68.2 Gb/s

Memory Max size

24 GB

16 GB

Storage Type

UFS 4.0

Camera

Max Camera Sensor Supported

320 MP

N/A

Max Video Capture Resolution

8K @ 30 FPS

Display

Max On-Device Display Resolution

UHD

3840x2400

Max Refresh Rate

120 Hz

N/A

Multimedia

Video Playback Resolution

8K @ 60 FPS

8K @ 30 FPS

Video Codecs

H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9

H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9

Audio Codecs

AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem Name

Exynos 5400

Exynos 5400c

5G Support

Yes

Peak Download Speed

Up to 12100 Mbps

N/A

Peak Upload Speed

Up to 3670 Mbps

N/A

Wi-Fi Version

Wi-Fi Standard

ac, ax, b, be, g, n, n 5GHz

a, ac, ax, b, be, g, n, n 5GHz

Bluetooth Version

5.4

6.0

Navigation

BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS

BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, QZSS

User Feedback

Related Comparisons

Samsung Exynos 2500

Apple A18 Pro

Samsung Exynos 2500

Samsung Exynos 2400

Samsung Exynos 2500

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

Samsung Exynos 2500

Google Tensor G5

Samsung Exynos 2500

Apple A17 Pro

Google Tensor G4

Samsung Exynos 2400

Google Tensor G4

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

Google Tensor G4

Google Tensor G5

Google Tensor G4

Apple A17 Pro

Google Tensor G4

Apple A16 Bionic