|
Add to Compare
|
×
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Apple A19 Pro
Share
Based on benchmark performance, Apple A19 Pro achieves a higher total AnTuTu score of 2,521,699 (tested by 91Mobiles), compared to Samsung Exynos 2500's 2,471,984 (tested by 91Mobiles), making Apple A19 Pro the more powerful processor.
... read more|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
Jun, 2025
|
Sep, 2025
|
CPU
|
Deca Core
(3.3 GHz, Single Core + 2.74 GHz, Dual core + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core + 1.8 GHz, Dual core)
|
Hexa Core
(4.26 GHz, Dual Core + 2.6 GHz, Quad core)
|
Process Node
|
3 nm
|
3 nm
|
GPU
|
Xclipse 950
|
Apple A19 Pro GPU
|
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5X
|
AnTuTu Score
|
2,471,984
|
2,521,699
|
Geekbench Score
|
2,346/7,911
|
3,834/9,921
|
Phones Powered by These SoCs
Benchmark
AnTuTu
(The higher, the better)
AnTuTu measures CPU, GPU, memory and overall performance in different scenarios
Samsung Exynos 2500
2,471,984
Apple A19 Pro
2,521,699
CPU
779,211
829,022
GPU
975,814
914,389
Memory
269,705
374,148
UX
447,254
404,140
Geekbench
(The higher, the better)
The Geekbench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Geekbench Single Core
Samsung Exynos 2500
2,346
Apple A19 Pro
3,834
Geekbench Multi Core
Samsung Exynos 2500
7,911
Apple A19 Pro
9,921
Benchmark Screenshots
AnTuTu Score:
General
SoC Brand
|
Samsung
|
Apple
|
Title
|
Samsung Exynos 2500
|
Apple A19 Pro
|
Model No
|
S5E9955
|
T8150
|
Manufacturing
|
Samsung
|
TSMC
|
CPU
Total Cores
|
Deca Core
|
Hexa Core
|
CPU
|
Deca Core (3.3 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X925 + 2.74 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A725 + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core, Cortex A725 + 1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A520)
|
Hexa Core (4.26 GHz, Dual Core, Everest + 2.6 GHz, Quad core, Sawtooth)
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Process Node
|
3 nm
|
3 nm
|
Instruction Set
|
ARMv9.2-A
|
ARMv9.4-A
|
L1 Cache
|
128 KB
|
320 KB
|
L2 Cache
|
3 MB
|
16 MB
|
L3 Cache
|
16 MB
|
N/A
|
GPU
GPU
|
Xclipse 950
|
Apple A19 Pro GPU
|
GPU Clock speed
|
999 MHz
|
1.62 GHz
|
Pipelines
|
8
|
6
|
Shading Units
|
128
|
128
|
Total Shaders
|
1024
|
768
|
FLOPS
|
4091.9 Gigaflops
|
2488.3 Gigaflops
|
Vulkan Version
|
1.4
|
N/A
|
OpenCL Version
|
3.0 FP
|
N/A
|
DirectX Version
|
12.1
|
N/A
|
AI
NPU
|
N/A
|
Neural Engine
|
Memory
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5X
|
Memory Speed
|
4.8 GHz
|
4.8 GHz
|
Bus
|
4x16 Bit
|
4x16 Bit
|
Memory Max bandwidth
|
76.8 Gb/s
|
75.8 Gb/s
|
Memory Max size
|
24 GB
|
12 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 4.0
|
NVMe
|
Camera
Max Camera Sensor Supported
|
320 MP
|
48 MP
|
Max Video Capture Resolution
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
UHD @ 120 FPS
|
Display
Max On-Device Display Resolution
|
UHD
|
N/A
|
Max Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Video Playback Resolution
|
8K @ 60 FPS
|
UHD @ 120 FPS
|
Video Codecs
|
H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9
|
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9
|
Audio Codecs
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
Connectivity
Modem Name
|
Exynos 5400
|
Snapdragon X80
|
5G Support
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Peak Download Speed
|
Up to 12100 Mbps
|
Up to 10000 Mbps
|
Peak Upload Speed
|
Up to 3670 Mbps
|
Up to 3700 Mbps
|
Wi-Fi Version
|
7
|
7
|
Wi-Fi Standard
|
ac, ax, b, be, g, n, n 5GHz
|
a, ac, ax, b, be, g, n, n 5GHz
|
Bluetooth Version
|
5.4
|
6.0
|
Navigation
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS
|
User Feedback
Related Comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2500
Samsung Exynos 2600
Samsung Exynos 2500
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Samsung Exynos 2500
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Samsung Exynos 2500
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Samsung Exynos 2500
Samsung Exynos 2400
Apple A19 Pro
Samsung Exynos 2600
Apple A19 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Apple A19 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Apple A19 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Apple A19 Pro
Samsung Exynos 2400