|
Add to Compare
|
×
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Share
Based on benchmark performance, MediaTek Dimensity 9400 achieves a higher total AnTuTu score of 2,537,181 (tested by 91Mobiles), compared to Samsung Exynos 2500's 2,471,984 (tested by 91Mobiles), making MediaTek Dimensity 9400 the more powerful processor.
... read more|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
Jun, 2025
|
Oct, 2024
|
CPU
|
Deca Core
(3.3 GHz, Single Core + 2.74 GHz, Dual core + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core + 1.8 GHz, Dual core)
|
Octa core
(3.62 GHz, Single Core + 3.3 GHz, Tri core + 2.4 GHz, Quad core)
|
Process Node
|
3 nm
|
3 nm
|
GPU
|
Xclipse 950
|
Immortalis-G925 MC12
|
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5X
|
AnTuTu Score
|
2,471,984
|
2,537,181
|
Geekbench Score
|
2,346/7,911
|
2,819/8,515
|
Phones Powered by These SoCs
View More
Benchmark
AnTuTu
(The higher, the better)
AnTuTu measures CPU, GPU, memory and overall performance in different scenarios
Samsung Exynos 2500
2,471,984
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
2,537,181
CPU
779,211
588,394
GPU
975,814
1,134,289
Memory
269,705
409,244
UX
447,254
405,254
Geekbench
(The higher, the better)
The Geekbench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Geekbench Single Core
Samsung Exynos 2500
2,346
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
2,819
Geekbench Multi Core
Samsung Exynos 2500
7,911
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
8,515
Benchmark Screenshots
AnTuTu Score:
General
SoC Brand
|
Samsung
|
MediaTek
|
Title
|
Samsung Exynos 2500
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
|
Model No
|
S5E9955
|
MT6991
|
Manufacturing
|
Samsung
|
TSMC
|
CPU
Total Cores
|
Deca Core
|
Octa core
|
CPU
|
Deca Core (3.3 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X925 + 2.74 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A725 + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core, Cortex A725 + 1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A520)
|
Octa core (3.62 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X925 + 3.3 GHz, Tri core, Cortex X4 + 2.4 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A720)
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Process Node
|
3 nm
|
3 nm
|
Instruction Set
|
ARMv9.2-A
|
ARMv9.2-A
|
L1 Cache
|
128 KB
|
128 KB
|
L2 Cache
|
3 MB
|
2 MB
|
L3 Cache
|
16 MB
|
12 MB
|
GPU
GPU
|
Xclipse 950
|
Immortalis-G925 MC12
|
GPU Clock speed
|
999 MHz
|
1.612 GHz
|
Pipelines
|
8
|
12
|
Shading Units
|
128
|
128
|
Total Shaders
|
1024
|
1536
|
FLOPS
|
4091.9 Gigaflops
|
4952.1 Gigaflops
|
Vulkan Version
|
1.4
|
1.3
|
OpenCL Version
|
3.0 FP
|
3.0 FP
|
DirectX Version
|
12.1
|
12.1
|
AI
NPU
|
N/A
|
NPU 890
|
Memory
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5X
|
Memory Speed
|
4.8 GHz
|
5.333 GHz
|
Bus
|
4x16 Bit
|
4x16 Bit
|
Memory Max bandwidth
|
76.8 Gb/s
|
85.3 Gb/s
|
Memory Max size
|
24 GB
|
24 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 4.0
|
UFS 4.0
|
Camera
Max Camera Sensor Supported
|
320 MP
|
320 MP
|
Max Video Capture Resolution
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
8K @ 60 FPS
|
Display
Max On-Device Display Resolution
|
UHD
|
UHD
|
Max Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
180 Hz
|
Color Depth
|
N/A
|
10 bit
|
Multimedia
Video Playback Resolution
|
8K @ 60 FPS
|
8K @ 60 FPS
|
Video Codecs
|
H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9
|
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
|
Audio Codecs
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
AAC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
|
Connectivity
Modem Name
|
Exynos 5400
|
N/A
|
5G Support
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Peak Download Speed
|
Up to 12100 Mbps
|
Up to 7300 Mbps
|
Peak Upload Speed
|
Up to 3670 Mbps
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi Version
|
7
|
7
|
Wi-Fi Standard
|
ac, ax, b, be, g, n, n 5GHz
|
a, ac, ax, b, be, g, n
|
Bluetooth Version
|
5.4
|
6.0
|
Navigation
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS
|
User Feedback
Related Comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2500
Samsung Exynos 2600
Samsung Exynos 2500
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Samsung Exynos 2500
Apple A19 Pro
Samsung Exynos 2500
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Samsung Exynos 2500
Samsung Exynos 2400
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Samsung Exynos 2600
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Apple A19 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Samsung Exynos 2400