The Pantel Penta T-Pad WS707C is a great tablet launched by the company in collaboration with BSNL Ltd. It offers great features at a reasonable price and can withstand competition from all the tablets launched lately in this segment.
The Penta T-Pad WS707C is an EDGE enabled,voice calling tablet built with the Android 4.1 JellyBean Operating System. It has a 7 inch multi-touch capacitive touch screen with 1024x600 pixels display resolution. It also offers 3D graphics support and dual screen video operations.
The tablet is powered by a 1.2 GHz Cortex A9 processor with 1GB DDR3 RAM. It has 8Gb internal memory which can be expanded up to 32GB externally via micro SD card.
Sound quality is poor, even caller sound is very low . Needs improvement in this aspects.
I think there should be an option for negative marking also.I would like to rate -5 for customer care .If you tell the I am going to take legal action they will tell you "you can".nnComplete waste of money .I have given my tablet for service but they returned it without doing any service not only their engineers are incapable but they are idiot.nThe company has hired donkeys on the name of engineers.nnI feel garbage cleaners are providing better service then penta.
|Model||Penta T-Pad WS707C (2G Calling Tab in 3D)|
|Operating System||Android v4.2.2 (Jelly Bean)|
|SIM Slot(s)||Single SIM, GSM|
|Screen Size||7 inches (17.78 cm)|
|Screen Resolution||600 x 1024 pixels|
|Pixel Density||170 ppi|
|Touch Screen||Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch|
|Processor||Single core, 1 GHz, Cortex A9|
|Internal Memory||4 GB|
|Expandable Memory||Up to 32 GB|
|Resolution||2 MP Primary Camera|
|Image Resolution||1600 x 1200 Pixels|
|Camera Features||Digital Zoom|
|Resolution||0.3 MP Front Camera|
|Camera Features||Fixed Focus|
GSM 1800 / 900 MHz
|Wi-Fi||Wi-Fi 802.11, b/g/n|
Dual core 1.2 GHz vs Single core 1.0 GHz
Higher battery capacity:
3500 mAH vs 3000 mAH
1 GB vs 512 MB
null 1.2 GHz vs Single core 1.0 GHz
Lower primary camera resolution:
0.3 MP vs 2 MP
Lower pixel density:
133 ppi vs 170 ppi
Sorry, no question asked yet.