|
53%
Adcom A40
₹2,199
(Discontinued)
|
52%
Kestrel KM 451
₹3,260
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Adcom A40 vs Kestrel KM 451
Comparing the Adcom A40 vs Kestrel KM 451 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Adcom A40 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Kestrel KM 451 runs at 1.0 GHz, making Adcom A40 the better performer.
Display: Kestrel KM 451 offers a screen size of 4.5 inches, while Adcom A40 offers 4 inches, making Kestrel KM 451 the larger display of the two. Both Adcom A40 and Kestrel KM 451 feature the same LCD display.
Rear Camera: Kestrel KM 451 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Adcom A40 offers 2 MP, making Kestrel KM 451 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Adcom A40 offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while Kestrel KM 451 offers 0.3 MP, making Adcom A40 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Kestrel KM 451 offers a higher battery capacity with 1750 mAh, while Adcom A40 offers 1650 mAh, making Kestrel KM 451 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Adcom A40 offers higher internal storage with 512 GB, while Kestrel KM 451 offers 4 GB, making Adcom A40 the better option for storage.
User Rating: Adcom A40 receives a higher user rating of 3.5, while Kestrel KM 451 has a rating of 3.2.
|
✕
Adcom A40
₹2,199
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Kestrel KM 451
₹3,260
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
53%
|
52%
|
Release Date
|
19 Nov, 2014
|
13 Dec, 2014
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
256 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
1.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
1650 mAh
|
1750 mAh
|
Storage
|
512 MB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.5/5
(19 ratings)
|
3.2/5
(6 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4.2 (KitKat)
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Dual core, 1 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400 MP2
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
256 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
218 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
56.64 %
|
61.12 %
|
Design
Height
|
126.5 mm
|
138.3 mm
|
Width
|
63.5 mm
|
66 mm
|
Thickness
|
11.5 mm
|
9.3 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
150 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1650 mAh
|
1750 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
512 MB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 64 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|