|
31%
Adcom Thunder A500
₹3,800
(Discontinued)
|
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Adcom Thunder A500 vs Lava Iris 406q
Comparing the Adcom Thunder A500 vs Lava Iris 406q across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lava Iris 406q runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Adcom Thunder A500 runs at 1.0 GHz, making Lava Iris 406q the better performer.
Display: Adcom Thunder A500 offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Lava Iris 406q offers 4 inches, making Adcom Thunder A500 the larger display of the two. Both Adcom Thunder A500 and Lava Iris 406q feature the same TFT display.
Rear Camera: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Adcom Thunder A500 offers 2 MP, making Lava Iris 406q better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Adcom Thunder A500 and Lava Iris 406q feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher battery capacity with 1700 mAh, while Adcom Thunder A500 offers 1650 mAh, making Lava Iris 406q better for longer battery life.
Storage: Adcom Thunder A500 offers higher internal storage with 512 GB, while Lava Iris 406q offers 4 GB, making Adcom Thunder A500 the better option for storage.
User Rating: Lava Iris 406q receives a higher user rating of 3.7, while Adcom Thunder A500 has a rating of 2.5.
|
✕
Adcom Thunder A500
₹3,800
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
31%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
21 Oct, 2013
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
256 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
|
540x960 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1650 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
512 MB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
2.5/5
(8 ratings)
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
N/A
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
256 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
540x960 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
196 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
58.93 %
|
57.38 %
|
Design
Height
|
149.6 mm
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
78 mm
|
64 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.5 mm
|
10.3 mm
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1650 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
512 MB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
N/A
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|