Airnet AN-6363 vs Micromax Q5c

Comparing the Airnet AN-6363 vs Micromax Q5c across camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Micromax Q5c offers a higher rear camera resolution with 2 MP, while Airnet AN-6363 offers 1.3 MP, making Micromax Q5c better for rear camera photography.

Battery: Airnet AN-6363 offers a higher battery capacity with 1400 mAh, while Micromax Q5c offers 1300 mAh, making Airnet AN-6363 better for longer battery life.

Airnet AN-6363

(Discontinued)

Micromax Q5c

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

28 Mar, 2010

15 Jul, 2010

User Ratings

N/A	3.7/5 (7 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

N/A

Screen Size

2.4 inches (6.1 cm)

N/A

Resolution

N/A	320x240 px

Design

Height

112 mm

Width

52 mm

58 mm

Thickness

13.00 mm

13.50 mm

Weight

120 grams

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

1400 mAh

1300 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 13(2G)

Up to 5(2G)

Storage

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 2 GB

Yes Up to 4 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Single SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AMR WAV

Yes Music Formats: Yes Multi Format Music Player (MP3 AMR MIDI WAV)

Sensors

Java

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes 1000 Entries

SMS

Yes	Yes SMS Storage 1000

MMS

Yes (Through GPRS)

Yes

Other Facilities

Alarm Clock Motion Sensor Unit Convertor Vibrator Calender World Clock Vibrating Alert Stereo Sound Warranty Period 1 Year

N/A