|
48%
Archos 35 Carbon
|
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Archos 35 Carbon vs Lava Iris 406q
Comparing the Archos 35 Carbon vs Lava Iris 406q across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lava Iris 406q runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Archos 35 Carbon runs at 1.0 GHz, making Lava Iris 406q the better performer.
Display: Lava Iris 406q offers a screen size of 4 inches, while Archos 35 Carbon offers 3.5 inches, making Lava Iris 406q the larger display of the two. Archos 35 Carbon features a IPS LCD display compared to Lava Iris 406q's TFT, making Archos 35 Carbon the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Archos 35 Carbon offers 0.3 MP, making Lava Iris 406q better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Archos 35 Carbon and Lava Iris 406q feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher battery capacity with 1700 mAh, while Archos 35 Carbon offers 1300 mAh, making Lava Iris 406q better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Archos 35 Carbon and Lava Iris 406q offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
|
✕
Archos 35 Carbon
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
48%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
03 May, 2013
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
Snapdragon S1
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
|
320x480 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1300 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7225A
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
Processor
|
1 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
320x480 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
165 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
50.04 %
|
57.38 %
|
Design
Height
|
117 mm
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
62.3 mm
|
64 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.2 mm
|
10.3 mm
|
Weight
|
105 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
640 x 480 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1300 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Mini
|
N/A
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v3.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|