|
54%
Archos 45 Titanium
|
iBall Andi Uddaan
₹3,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Archos 45 Titanium vs iBall Andi Uddaan
Comparing the Archos 45 Titanium vs iBall Andi Uddaan across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both Archos 45 Titanium and iBall Andi Uddaan run at the same processing speed of 1.3 GHz.
Display: iBall Andi Uddaan offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Archos 45 Titanium offers 4.5 inches, making iBall Andi Uddaan the larger display of the two. Archos 45 Titanium features a IPS LCD display compared to iBall Andi Uddaan's LCD, making Archos 45 Titanium the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: iBall Andi Uddaan offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Archos 45 Titanium offers 5 MP, making iBall Andi Uddaan better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: iBall Andi Uddaan offers a higher front camera resolution with 5 MP, while Archos 45 Titanium offers 0.3 MP, making iBall Andi Uddaan better for front camera photography.
Battery: iBall Andi Uddaan offers a higher battery capacity with 2000 mAh, while Archos 45 Titanium offers 1680 mAh, making iBall Andi Uddaan better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Archos 45 Titanium and iBall Andi Uddaan offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
|
Archos 45 Titanium
|
iBall Andi Uddaan
₹3,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
54%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
16 Nov, 2013
|
17 Dec, 2013
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
480x854 px
|
540x960 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1680 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
3.5/5
(190 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.2.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
540x960 px
|
Pixel Density
|
218 ppi
|
220 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
61.14 %
|
61.22 %
|
Design
Height
|
133.8 mm
|
150 mm
|
Width
|
68.2 mm
|
75 mm
|
Thickness
|
10 mm
|
11 mm
|
Weight
|
152 grams
|
168 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1280x720 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1680 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Mini
|
N/A
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.16 W/kg Body: 0.77 W/kg
|
Head: 0.421 W/kg Body: 0.427 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v3.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
N/A
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Applications
|
N/A
|
SOS ICE Tracking etc.
|