|
67%
Blackview A80 Pro
₹16,500
(Discontinued)
|
78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max
₹15,927
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Blackview A80 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max
Comparing the Blackview A80 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Blackview A80 Pro runs at a higher processing speed of 2.6 GHz, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max runs at 2.3 GHz, making Blackview A80 Pro the better performer.
Display: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max offers a screen size of 6.67 inches, while Blackview A80 Pro offers 6.49 inches, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max the larger display of the two. Both Blackview A80 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while Blackview A80 Pro offers 13 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while Blackview A80 Pro offers 8 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max better for front camera photography.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max offers a higher battery capacity with 5020 mAh, while Blackview A80 Pro offers 4680 mAh, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Blackview A80 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Blackview A80 Pro has a rating of 1.
|
✕
Blackview A80 Pro
₹16,500
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max
₹15,927
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
67%
|
78%
|
Release Date
|
05 Feb, 2020
|
11 May, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6757CD
|
Snapdragon 720G
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.6 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.49 inches (16.48 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1560 px (HD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
64 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
0.3 MP
Camera
|
5 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
0.3 MP
Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4680 mAh
|
5020 mAh
|
|
Fast Charging
|
33W Fast Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.1
|
User Ratings
|
1/5
(1 rating)
|
4.4/5
(42,317 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
277,621
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
19h 03m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
May 11, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6757CD
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 1.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 465 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 465 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
8 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-T880 MP2
|
Adreno 618
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
277,621
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
22.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
4.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
30.6 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.49 inches (16.48 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1560 px (HD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
450 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
265 ppi
|
395 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.33 %
|
84.73 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.3 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
162.75 mm
|
165.5 mm
|
Width
|
77 mm
|
76.6 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.8 mm
|
8.8 mm
|
Weight
|
180 grams
|
209 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary CameraIMX258 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor |
64 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.891/1.7" sensor size S5KGW1 CMOS image sensor ISOCELL Plus 1.6µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
|
0.3 MP
|
5 MP
Macro Camera1.12µm pixel size |
|
0.3 MP
|
2 MP
Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps HD @960 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Slow Motion
Movie Frame Video Pro Mode |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
32 MP
Primary Camera1/2.8" sensor size 1.6µm pixel size |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4680 mAh
|
5020 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 19 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes Fast Charging
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 50% in 30 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
19h 03m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 39m 53s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
N/A
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.880 W/kg Body: 0.475 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) MIMO
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|