|
71%
CAT S52
₹69,900
(Discontinued)
|
93%
vivo X200T
₹59,999
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
CAT S52 vs vivo X200T
Comparing the CAT S52 vs vivo X200T across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: vivo X200T runs at a higher processing speed of 3.73 GHz, while CAT S52 runs at 2.3 GHz, making vivo X200T the better performer.
Display: vivo X200T offers a screen size of 6.67 inches, while CAT S52 offers 5.65 inches, making vivo X200T the larger display of the two. vivo X200T features a AMOLED display compared to CAT S52's IPS LCD, making vivo X200T the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: vivo X200T offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while CAT S52 offers 12 MP, making vivo X200T better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: vivo X200T offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while CAT S52 offers 8 MP, making vivo X200T better for front camera photography.
Battery: vivo X200T offers a higher battery capacity with 6200 mAh, while CAT S52 offers 3100 mAh, making vivo X200T better for longer battery life.
Storage: CAT S52 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while vivo X200T offers 256 GB, making CAT S52 the better option for storage.
|
✕
CAT S52
₹69,900
(Discontinued)
|
✕
vivo X200T
₹59,999
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
71%
|
93%
|
Release Date
|
12 Nov, 2020
|
03 Feb, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P35
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 3.73 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
12 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
5.65 inches (14.35 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
720x1440 px (HD+)
|
1260x2800 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
12 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
N/A
|
50 MP
Telephoto Camera (upto 3x Optical Zoom)
|
|
N/A
|
50 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
32 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3100 mAh
|
6200 mAh
|
|
Fast Charging
|
90W Flash Charging
|
|
N/A
|
Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
256 GB
|
|
N/A
|
UFS 4.0
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.4/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
4.6/5
(6,379 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
2,821,319
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
16h 14m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹59,999
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Jan 27, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
5 Years
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
7 Years
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Excellent
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P35
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus MT6691
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 2.3 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
3.73 GHz, Single core, Cortex X925 3.3 GHz, Tri core, Cortex X4 2.4 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A720 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
3 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
Immortalis-G925 MC12
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
12 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR5X Ultra
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
2,821,319
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
19.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
6,124
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
26.5 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
5.65 inches (14.35 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1440 px (HD+)
|
1260x2800 px (FHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
5000 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
N/A
|
1600 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
285 ppi
|
460 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
68.02 %
|
90.35 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v6
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
94.30 %
|
Design
Height
|
158.1 mm
|
160 mm
|
Width
|
76.6 mm
|
74.3 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.69 mm
|
7.99 mm
|
Weight
|
210 grams
|
203 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Aluminium Glass
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Water resistant IP68 (up to 30 minutes in a depth of 1.5 meter)
|
Yes Water resistant IP68 (up to 30 minutes in a depth of 1 meter)
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Excellent
|
Resolution
|
12 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81/1.4" sensor size |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.57 Wide Angle23 mm focal length 1/1.57" sensor size LYT 702 1µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
50 MP
f/2.0 Telephoto Camera70 mm focal length 1/1.95" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
50 MP
f/2.0 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera15 mm focal length 1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection autofocus
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
6144 x 8192 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
4k @60 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Bokeh portrait video
Video Pro Mode |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Excellent
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
32 MP
f/2.0 Ultra-Wide Angle Primary Camera20 mm focal length 1/3.44" sensor size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
4k @60 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
3100 mAh
|
6200 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Silicon Carbon
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 29 Hours(3G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes Fast Charging
|
Yes 90W Flash Charging
|
Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 40W Wireless Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
16h 14m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
0h 44m 0s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
256 GB / 512 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
UFS 4.0
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
N/A
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano/eSIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/e/g/n/ac/be/ax) MIMO
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.4
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
N/A
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Ultrasonic
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
N/A
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹59,999
|