Celkon A15 Campus
₹3,899
(Discontinued)
|
XOLO Q700i
₹11,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Celkon A15 Campus vs XOLO Q700i
Comparing the Celkon A15 Campus vs XOLO Q700i across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: XOLO Q700i runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Celkon A15 Campus runs at 1.0 GHz, making XOLO Q700i the better performer.
Display: XOLO Q700i offers a screen size of 4.5 inches, while Celkon A15 Campus offers 3.5 inches, making XOLO Q700i the larger display of the two. Both Celkon A15 Campus and XOLO Q700i feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: XOLO Q700i offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Celkon A15 Campus offers 3.2 MP, making XOLO Q700i better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: XOLO Q700i offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while Celkon A15 Campus offers 0.3 MP, making XOLO Q700i better for front camera photography.
Battery: XOLO Q700i offers a higher battery capacity with 2400 mAh, while Celkon A15 Campus offers 1400 mAh, making XOLO Q700i better for longer battery life.
Storage: Celkon A15 Campus offers higher internal storage with 512 GB, while XOLO Q700i offers 4 GB, making Celkon A15 Campus the better option for storage.
User Rating: XOLO Q700i receives a higher user rating of 4, while Celkon A15 Campus has a rating of 3.1.
|
✕
Celkon A15 Campus
₹3,899
(Discontinued)
|
✕
XOLO Q700i
₹11,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
07 Oct, 2013
|
10 Oct, 2013
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
MediaTek MT6589M
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
256 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
320x480 px
|
540x960 px
|
Rear Camera
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
1400 mAh
|
2400 mAh
|
Storage
|
512 MB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.1/5
(20 ratings)
|
4/5
(196 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Oct 10, 2013
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.2.2 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Chipset
|
N/A
|
MediaTek MT6589M
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
PowerVR SGX 544
|
RAM
|
256 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
Resolution
|
320x480 px
|
540x960 px
|
Pixel Density
|
165 ppi
|
245 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
60.86 %
|
Design
Height
|
N/A
|
135.8 mm
|
Width
|
N/A
|
67.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
N/A
|
10.2 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
151.3 grams
|
Rear Camera
Resolution
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2048 x 1536 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Digital image stabilization |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1280x720 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Capacity
|
1400 mAh
|
2400 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 16.5 Hours(3G) / Up to 17.8 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
512 MB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Mini
|
N/A
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.366 W/kg Body: 0.561 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v3.0
|
GPS
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|