Coolpad 9000 vs Micromax Q35

Comparing the Coolpad 9000 vs Micromax Q35 across camera to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Coolpad 9000 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 3 MP, while Micromax Q35 offers 0.3 MP, making Coolpad 9000 better for rear camera photography.

Coolpad 9000

(Discontinued)

Micromax Q35

₹3,835

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Jan, 2008

22 Jun, 2011

Performance

256 MB RAM

N/A

Display

N/A	2.20 inches (5.59 cm)
LCD	LCD
800.00x 800 pixels px (HD)	240x320 px

Rear Camera

3 MP

Primary Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

N/A

1050 mAh

Storage

4 GB

N/A

User Ratings

N/A	3.1/5 (33 ratings)

User Feedback

General

Operating System

Windows Mobile

N/A

Performance

RAM

256 MB

N/A

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

N/A	2.20 inches (5.59 cm)

Resolution

800.00x 800 pixels px (HD)

240x320 px

Pixel Density

N/A

182 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

23.3 %

Design

Height

135.00 mm

111 mm

Width

75.00 mm

58 mm

Thickness

18.00 mm

13.00 mm

Weight

230 grams

106 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

3 MP
Primary Camera

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Shooting Modes

N/A	Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

N/A

1050 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 4(2G)

N/A

Yes

MMS

N/A

Yes