Eten Glofiish X800 vs Micromax Q7

Comparing the Eten Glofiish X800 vs Micromax Q7 across camera and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Both Eten Glofiish X800 and Micromax Q7 feature a 2 MP primary rear camera.

Storage: Micromax Q7 offers higher internal storage with 78 GB, while Eten Glofiish X800 offers 256 GB, making Micromax Q7 the better option for storage.

Eten Glofiish X800

(Discontinued)

Micromax Q7

₹7,499

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Nov, 2007

15 May, 2010

Performance

64 MB RAM

N/A

Display

LCD	N/A
640.00x 640 pixels, 2.8 inches px	320x240 px

Rear Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

N/A

800 mAh

Storage

256 MB

78 MB

User Ratings

N/A	2.9/5 (28 ratings)

User Feedback

Performance

RAM

64 MB

N/A

Display

Display Type

LCD

N/A

Resolution

640.00x 640 pixels 2.8 inches px

320x240 px

Design

Height

113.50 mm

110 mm

Width

60.50 mm

59 mm

Thickness

15.80 mm

10.70 mm

Weight

146 grams

100 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera

Autofocus

Yes

N/A

Flash

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

N/A

800 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 4(2G)

Up to 4.5(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

256 MB

78 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 4 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Yes Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 a/b/g)

Bluetooth

Yes v2

Yes

Multimedia

Audio Jack

N/A

3.5 mm

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV Background Music Playback Built in Yamaha Audio Amplifier

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

N/A	Yes 1000 entries Photocall

SMS

N/A	Yes 1000 Entries

MMS

N/A

Yes

Other Facilities

facilities

Voice memo T9