Eten Glofiish X900 vs Fujitsu Siemens LOOX F-07C

Share  

Comparing the Eten Glofiish X900 vs Fujitsu Siemens LOOX F-07C across camera and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Fujitsu Siemens LOOX F-07C offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Eten Glofiish X900 offers 3.2 MP, making Fujitsu Siemens LOOX F-07C better for rear camera photography.


Storage: Eten Glofiish X900 offers higher internal storage with 256 GB, while Fujitsu Siemens LOOX F-07C offers 1 GB, making Eten Glofiish X900 the better option for storage.

...read more
Eten Glofiish X900
(Discontinued)
Add to Compare

Summary

Release Date

01 Jun, 2008
16 May, 2011

User Feedback

General

Operating System

N/A
Windows Home

Performance

Processor

N/A
1.2 GHz

RAM

128 MB
1 GB

Display

Display Type

LCD
LCD

Screen Size

N/A
4 inches  (10.16 cm)

Resolution

640.00x 640 pixels 2.8 inches px
1024x600 px (HD)

Pixel Density

N/A
297 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A
58.99 %

Design

Height

106.00 mm
125 mm

Width

60.50 mm
61 mm

Thickness

17.00 mm
19.80 mm

Weight

147 grams
218 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

3.2 MP
Primary Camera
5 MP
Primary Camera

Autofocus

Yes
N/A

Flash

Yes
Yes

Image Resolution

N/A
2592 x 1944 Pixels

Shooting Modes

N/A
Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

N/A
Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Front Camera

Resolution

N/A
0.3 MP
Primary Camera

Battery

TalkTime

N/A
Up to 7.33(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

256 MB
1 GB

Expandable Storage

Yes
Yes Up to 32 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM
Single SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported
5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Yes Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 a/b/g)
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)

Bluetooth

Yes v2
Yes v2

GPS

N/A
Yes with A-GPS

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player
N/A

Sensors

Other Sensors

N/A
Proximity sensor

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0
N/A

Browser

Yes
N/A

Other Facilities

facilities
N/A

Applications

N/A
Microsoft Office Personal 2010 (with 2-year License)