Fly MC 160 Touch vs Micromax H360

Comparing the Fly MC 160 Touch vs Micromax H360 across camera and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Both Fly MC 160 Touch and Micromax H360 feature a 3 MP primary rear camera.

Storage: Fly MC 160 Touch offers higher internal storage with 87 GB, while Micromax H360 offers 52 GB, making Fly MC 160 Touch the better option for storage.

Fly MC 160 Touch

(Discontinued)

Micromax H360

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

N/A	10 Oct, 2009

Display

N/A	2.4 inches (6.1 cm)
LCD	N/A
240x 320 pixels px	240x320 px

Rear Camera

3 MP

Primary Camera

3 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

N/A

1000 mAh

Storage

87 MB

52 MB

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

N/A

Screen Size

N/A	2.4 inches (6.1 cm)

Resolution

240x 320 pixels px

240x320 px

Pixel Density

N/A

167 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

31.72 %

Design

Height

115 mm

113 mm

Width

51 mm

49.8 mm

Thickness

14.50 mm

13.00 mm

Weight

100 grams

104 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Battery

Capacity

N/A

1000 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 4(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

87 MB

52 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 8 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Yes v2

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: MP3 AAC+ AAC MIDI WAV

Yes Music Formats: Yes Multi Format Music Player (MP3 / AMR / MIDI / WAV) Background Music Playback

Sensors

Games

N/A	1 preloaded game

Java

Yes	Yes MIDP 2.0

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

2000 entries

Yes 1000 entries Photocall

SMS

N/A	Yes SMS Storage 600

MMS

N/A

Yes

Other Facilities

Music Phone Slef Help Remote Control Mobile Tracker Privacy Protection Expandable Memory up to 8 -GB

TV Out Conference Call Speed Dial STK