Google Pixel 10A vs vivo X300 FE

Comparing the Google Pixel 10A vs vivo X300 FE across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Performance: vivo X300 FE runs at a higher processing speed of 3.8 GHz, while Google Pixel 10A runs at 3.1 GHz, making vivo X300 FE the better performer.

Display: vivo X300 FE offers a screen size of 6.31 inches, while Google Pixel 10A offers 6.3 inches, making vivo X300 FE the larger display of the two. vivo X300 FE features a AMOLED display compared to Google Pixel 10A's P-OLED, making vivo X300 FE the better display of the two.

Rear Camera: vivo X300 FE offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Google Pixel 10A offers 48 MP, making vivo X300 FE better for rear camera photography.

Front Camera: vivo X300 FE offers a higher front camera resolution with 50 MP, while Google Pixel 10A offers 13 MP, making vivo X300 FE better for front camera photography.

Battery: vivo X300 FE delivers longer battery life with 16h 04m, while Google Pixel 10A delivers 13h 54m, making vivo X300 FE the better pick for all day usage.

Storage: Both Google Pixel 10A and vivo X300 FE offer the same internal storage of 256 GB.

Expert Review: vivo X300 FE receives a higher expert rating of 8.4 from the editorial team, while Google Pixel 10A is rated 7.9.

User Rating: Google Pixel 10A and vivo X300 FE both receive the same user rating of 4.5.

Google Pixel 10A

₹47,340

@ Amazon

vivo X300 FE

₹79,999

@ Amazon

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Spec Score

87%

95%

Release Date

06 Mar, 2026

06 May, 2026

Performance


Google Tensor G4	Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Octa Core (upto 3.1 GHz)	Octa Core (upto 3.8 GHz)
8 GB RAM	12 GB RAM

Display


6.3 inches (16 cm)	6.31 inches (16.03 cm)
P-OLED	AMOLED
1080x2424 px (FHD+)	1216x2640 px (FHD+)
120 Hz Refresh Rate	120 Hz Refresh Rate

Rear Camera


48 MP Primary Camera	50 MP Primary Camera
13 MP Ultra-Wide Angle Camera	50 MP Telephoto Camera (upto 3x Optical Zoom)
N/A	8 MP Ultra-Wide Angle Camera

Front Camera


13 MP	50 MP

Battery


5100 mAh	6500 mAh
45W Fast Charging	90W Flash Charging
Wireless Charging	Wireless Charging

Storage

256 GB	256 GB
UFS 3.1	UFS 4.1

Expert Review

7.9/10

Read Expert Review

8.4/10

Read Expert Review

Pros

Compact design, improved durability
Decent battery life
7 years of software updates

Compact, premium design
Excellent battery life
Reliable performance
Strong portrait photography

Cons

Same Tensor G4 chip as Pixel 9a
Limited AI features
Slow charging speed

Video recording inconsistencies
Colours can be slightly oversaturated

User Ratings

4.5/5

(1,416 ratings)

4.5/5

(140 ratings)

Benchmarks (The higher, the better)

1,400,792 AnTuTu Score	3,000,897 AnTuTu Score
13h 54m Battery Life (PC Mark)	16h 04m Battery Life (PC Mark)

Compare Prices

₹47,340

@ Amazon

₹79,999

@ Amazon

Compare in 360 View

User Feedback

General

Launch Date

Feb 18, 2026

(Official)

May 06, 2026

(Official)

Operating System

Android v16

OS Updates

7 Year

5 Year

Security Updates

7 Year

Custom UI

N/A

Origin OS

Performance

Performance Rating

Very Good

Excellent

Chipset

Google Tensor G4

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 SM8845

Processor

Octa core

3.1 GHz, Single core, Cortex X4 2.6 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A720 1.92 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A520

Octa core

3.8 GHz, Dual core, Oryon V3 Phoenix L 3.32 GHz, Hexa Core, Oryon V3 Phoenix M

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit

Fabrication (The lower, the better)

4 nm

3 nm

Graphics (GPU)

Mali-G715 MP7

Adreno 829

RAM

8 GB

12 GB

RAM Type

LPDDR5X

LPDDR5X Ultra

Performance Test Results

AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.

1,400,792

3,000,897

Bootup Time (The lower, the better)

8.0 s

14.0 s

Gaming Test Results

Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.

N/A

4,004

Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)

9.0 %

5.0 %

Heating* (The lower, the better)

32.8 %

17.4 %

* after 30 mins of gaming

Display

Display Rating

Excellent

Best In Class

Display Type

P-OLED

AMOLED

Screen Size

6.3 inches (16 cm)

6.31 inches (16.03 cm)

Resolution

1080x2424 px (FHD+)

1216x2640 px (FHD+)

Peak Brightness

3000 nits

5000 nits

HBM Brightness

1800 nits

N/A

Refresh Rate

120 Hz

Aspect Ratio

20:9

19.5:9

Pixel Density

422 ppi

460 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

85.29 %

90.11 %

Screen Protection

Corning Gorilla Glass Glass 7i

Yes

Bezel-less Display

Yes with punch-hole display

HDR 10 / HDR+ Support

Yes	Yes HDR 10+

Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)

N/A

94.38 %

Design

Height

153.9 mm

150.83 mm

Width

73 mm

71.76 mm

Thickness

9 mm

7.99 mm

Weight

183 grams

191 grams

Build Material

Back: Plastic

Back: Glass

Water Resistance

Yes Water resistant IP68

Yes Water resistant IP68 IP69 (up to 30 minutes in a depth of 1.5 meter)

Ruggedness

Dust proof

Rear Camera

Rear Camera Rating

Very Good

Excellent

Resolution

48 MP
Primary Camera5x Digital Zoomf/1.725 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size

50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.57IMX921

13 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera22 mm focal length 1/3.1" sensor size

50 MP
f/2.65 Telephoto Camera

N/A	8 MP f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera

Autofocus

N/A

Yes

OIS

N/A

Yes

Flash

Yes Dual LED Flash

Camera Features

5 x Digital Zoom

N/A

Video Recording

4k @30/60 fps
Full HD @30/60 fps

8k @30 fps
4k @30/60 fps
Full HD @30/60/120 fps

Front Camera

Front Camera Rating

Excellent

Best In Class

Resolution

13 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera

50 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera

Autofocus

N/A

Yes

Flash

Yes	Yes Screen flash

Video Recording

4k @30 fps

N/A

Compare Camera Samples

Battery

Battery Rating

Very Good

Excellent

Capacity

5100 mAh

6500 mAh

Battery Type

Li-Polymer

Li-ion

Quick Charging

Yes 45W Fast Charging

Yes 90W Flash Charging

Wireless Charging

Yes	Yes 40W Wireless Charging

Battery Test Results

Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.

13h 54m

16h 04m

Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)

1h 26m 0s

0h 41m 0s

Storage

Internal Storage

256 GB

256 GB / 512 GB

Storage Type

UFS 3.1

UFS 4.1

Expandable Storage

N/A

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

SIM Type

SIM1: Nano SIM2: eSIM

SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano/eSIM

Network Support

5G 4G

VoLTE

Yes

SIM 1

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N2 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N12 / N18 / N19 / N20 / N26 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N66 / N75 / N77 / N78 / N79

N/A

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39) / 3500(band 42)
FD-LTE 1700(band 66) / 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 7009(band 12) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 1500(band 21) / 850(band 26)

N/A

SIM 2

N/A	5G Bands: FDD N1 / N2 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N18 / N20 / N25 / N26 / N28 / N66 / N71 / N75 TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N48 / N77 / N78

N/A

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39) / 3500(band 42) / 3700(band 43) / 3500(band 48)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 1500(band 32) / 700(band 12) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 600(Band 71) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26) / 1700(band 66)