HP IPAQ 512 vs Philips X528

Comparing the HP IPAQ 512 vs Philips X528 across camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Philips X528 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 3.2 MP, while HP IPAQ 512 offers 1.3 MP, making Philips X528 better for rear camera photography.

Battery: Philips X528 offers a higher battery capacity with 1500 mAh, while HP IPAQ 512 offers 1100 mAh, making Philips X528 better for longer battery life.

HP IPAQ 512

(Discontinued)

Philips X528

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Apr, 2007

19 Mar, 2012

Display

N/A	2.6 inches (6.6 cm)
LCD	LCD
220.00x 220 pixels, 2.0 inch px	240x320 px

Rear Camera

1.3 MP

Primary Camera

3.2 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

1100 mAh

1500 mAh

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

N/A	2.6 inches (6.6 cm)

Resolution

220.00x 220 pixels 2.0 inch px

240x320 px

Pixel Density

N/A

154 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

34.23 %

Design

Height

107.00 mm

120 mm

Width

48.60 mm

51 mm

Thickness

16.30 mm

18.10 mm

Weight

102 grams

180 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

3.2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Shooting Modes

N/A	Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Video Recording

N/A	220x176 @ 10

Battery

Capacity

1100 mAh

1500 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 6.5(2G)

Up to 30(2G)

Storage

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 32 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Yes Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 b/g)

Bluetooth

Yes v1.2

Yes v2.1

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 AAC AAC+ WMA

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AAC+ WAV with Loud Speaker

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes In shared memory

Yes

SMS

N/A	Yes Threaded View

MMS

N/A

Yes

Other Facilities

N/A	Organizer Voice memo Predictive text input