|
51%
HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM
₹9,990
(Discontinued)
|
Motorola Moto E
₹4,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM vs Motorola Moto E
Comparing the HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM vs Motorola Moto E across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Motorola Moto E runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM runs at 1.0 GHz, making Motorola Moto E the better performer.
Display: Motorola Moto E offers a screen size of 4.3 inches, while HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM offers 4 inches, making Motorola Moto E the larger display of the two. Both HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM and Motorola Moto E feature the same TFT display.
Rear Camera: Both HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM and Motorola Moto E feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Battery: Motorola Moto E offers a higher battery capacity with 1980 mAh, while HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM offers 1300 mAh, making Motorola Moto E better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM and Motorola Moto E offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Motorola Moto E receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM has a rating of 3.5.
|
HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM
₹9,990
(Discontinued)
|
Motorola Moto E
₹4,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
51%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
03 May, 2014
|
14 May, 2014
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
Snapdragon 200
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.3 inches (10.92 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
540x960 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
N/A
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1300 mAh
|
1980 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.5/5
(719 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(200,242 ratings)
|
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, ARM Cortex A7
|
Dual core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400 MP
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.3 inches (10.92 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
540x960 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
256 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
55.69 %
|
62.88 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Design
Height
|
125.7 mm
|
124.8 mm
|
Width
|
65 mm
|
64.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.5 mm
|
12.3 mm
|
Weight
|
130 grams
|
142 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1300 mAh
|
1980 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 9 Hours(3G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
N/A
|
SIM1: Micro
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|