1. Trusted Brand
2. Motorola is one of the oldest phone makers in the world. Motorola is know for providing a near-stock Android experience in its smartphones and is quick to get the latest Android updates
3. Motorola has several service centres in the most of cities in India. Also it provides online chat option along with customer support over the phone 7 days a week. Toll Free Number: 1-800-102-2344.
Official Website
|
|
|
|
The Moto E has a lot to offer if you re in the market for a budget Android smartphone
May 24 2014 By Deepak DhingraIt takes a lot to stand out in the budget segment – choices are many but most of them compromise on build quality, core specs and screen resolutions, and run older versions of Android. The Moto E scores on all of these aspects, especially build and screen quality. The Gorilla Glass 3 protection is great to have at this price, but above all, it’s the inclusion of Android KitKat that stands out. The promise of a speedy update to the next major platform refresh is also quite attractive. On the negative side, its fixed-focus snapper and the missing front camera don’t bode too well for it. Not that the Moto E doesn’t have any competition. As we found out in our review, the similarly-priced dual-SIM Lava Iris 406Q is a very worthy rival, trumping the Moto E with its quad-core Snapdragon processor and inclusion of a front camera. While it does feel a tad plasticky in comparison, runs Android Jelly Bean and sports a smaller, lower-res screen, the Iris 406Q also scores in terms of looks. Micromax’s answer to the Moto E was just announced too in the form of the Unite 2, and that looks like a compelling device too, stealing the Moto’s thunder by also offering KitKat out of the box. The Unite 2 also supports dual SIMs, and scores over the Moto E in terms of core specs. It sports a larger 4.7-inch (albeit lower in resolution) screen, a 1.3GHz quad-core MediaTek chip and a 5MP camera that boasts autofocus – a feature that isn’t available on either the Moto E or the Lava Iris 406Q. Its price? Rs 6,999, exactly the same as the Moto E.It goes without saying that making a choice isn’t easy. The lure of higher specs at the same price could be tough to ignore, but that said, the Moto E is still a highly compelling budget device. We’ve already mentioned the reasons why, but the backing of a global brand and the peace of mind associated with buying something that should last a long time is also worth considering. If you’re looking for a budget, no-frills dual-SIM smartphone as your daily driver or need a secondary device, the Moto E should be at the top of your list. Did we mention it has an FM radio too?
Read Full ReviewMy happiness on getting this awesome phone was quickly turned to dismay when i noticed on the 1st day itself that its back cover was very loose and when i called the flipkart team about this they informed me they were aware of some such defective products and they will get back to me as soon as they get any update on this. Even after repeated customer care calls and a week after that i have not received any word from them. As the days have progressed the problem has only gotten worser with my back cover, so guys please be careful as its clear that the flipkart team is only concerned about delivery and not bothered about its product service or customer concerns.
Hello Readers,nnThe overall performance and other aspects of this phone are excellent but there is one major flaw with the moto e back cover/shell design.nnIf you try to remove the cover multiple times, it will not fit complete into the phone and will come out a little bit.nnThis sounds a little cheap and I did not expect this from such a quality phone which is advertised as "Build To last"nnBeware, if you are going to buy multiple shells and flip them frequently then you are going to damage them after few days.. (and FYI shells cost Rs900 which is EXPENSIVE)
RAM | 1 GB |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 |
Rear Camera | 5 MP |
Battery | 1980 mAh |
Display | 4.3 inches (10.92 cm) |
Operating System | Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat) |
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 |
CPU | Dual core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7 |
Graphics | Adreno 302 |
RAM | 1 GB |
Display Type | TFT |
Screen Size | 4.3 inches (10.92 cm) |
Resolution | 540 x 960 pixels |
Pixel Density | 256 ppi |
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated) | 62.88 % |
Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass v3 |
Touch Screen | Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch |
Height | 124.8 mm Compare Size |
Width | 64.8 mm |
Thickness | 12.3 mm |
Weight | 142 grams |
Colours | Black, White |
Main Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
5 MP, Primary Camera |
|
Image Resolution | 2592 x 1944 Pixels | |
Shooting Modes | High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) | |
Camera Features | Digital Zoom |
Capacity | 1980 mAh |
Type | Li-ion |
Removable | No |
Internal Memory | 4 GB |
Expandable Memory | Yes, Up to 32 GB |
SIM Slot(s) | Dual SIM, GSM+GSM |
SIM Size | SIM1: Micro |
Network Support | 5G Not Supported in India, 3G, 2G |
SIM 1 |
3G Bands: UMTS 1900 / 2100 / 850 / 900 MHz 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz 3G Speed: HSDPA 21.1 Mbit/s ↓, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s ↑ GPRS: Available EDGE: Available
|
SIM 2 |
2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz
|
Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) |
Wi-Fi Features | Mobile Hotspot |
Bluetooth | Yes, v4.0 |
GPS | Yes with A-GPS, Glonass |
USB Connectivity | microUSB 2.0 |
FM Radio | Yes, RDS |
Loudspeaker | Yes |
Audio Jack | 3.5 mm |
Other Sensors | Proximity sensor, Accelerometer |
Larger screen:
4.70 inches (11.94 cm) vs 4.30 inches (10.92 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.6 GHz vs Dual core 1.2 GHz
Higher primary camera resolution:
8 MP vs 5 MP
Larger screen:
4.70 inches (11.94 cm) vs 4.30 inches (10.92 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.3 GHz vs Dual core 1.2 GHz
Higher battery capacity:
2000 mAH vs 1980 mAH
Larger screen:
5.00 inches (12.7 cm) vs 4.30 inches (10.92 cm)
More RAM:
768 MB vs 1 GB
Higher battery capacity:
2000 mAH vs 1980 mAH
Larger screen:
4.50 inches (11.43 cm) vs 4.30 inches (10.92 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.2 GHz vs Dual core 1.2 GHz
Higher battery capacity:
2070 mAH vs 1980 mAH
Larger screen:
4.50 inches (11.43 cm) vs 4.30 inches (10.92 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.2 GHz vs Dual core 1.2 GHz
Higher primary camera resolution:
8 MP vs 5 MP
Larger screen:
4.50 inches (11.43 cm) vs 4.30 inches (10.92 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.2 GHz vs Dual core 1.2 GHz
More RAM:
512 MB vs 1 GB
Rs 31,142