HTC Desire 526G Plus 8GB
₹12,400
(Out of Stock)
|
74%
Lava Virat V1 5G
₹12,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
HTC Desire 526G Plus 8GB vs Lava Virat V1 5G
Comparing the HTC Desire 526G Plus 8GB vs Lava Virat V1 5G across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lava Virat V1 5G runs at a higher processing speed of 2.7 GHz, while HTC Desire 526G Plus 8GB runs at 1.7 GHz, making Lava Virat V1 5G the better performer.
Display: Lava Virat V1 5G offers a screen size of 6.75 inches, while HTC Desire 526G Plus 8GB offers 4.7 inches, making Lava Virat V1 5G the larger display of the two. Lava Virat V1 5G features a LCD display compared to HTC Desire 526G Plus 8GB's TFT, making Lava Virat V1 5G the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Lava Virat V1 5G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while HTC Desire 526G Plus 8GB offers 8 MP, making Lava Virat V1 5G better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Lava Virat V1 5G offers a higher front camera resolution with 5 MP, while HTC Desire 526G Plus 8GB offers 2 MP, making Lava Virat V1 5G better for front camera photography.
Battery: Lava Virat V1 5G offers a higher battery capacity with 6000 mAh, while HTC Desire 526G Plus 8GB offers 2000 mAh, making Lava Virat V1 5G better for longer battery life.
Storage: HTC Desire 526G Plus 8GB offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Lava Virat V1 5G offers 64 GB, making HTC Desire 526G Plus 8GB the better option for storage.
|
HTC Desire 526G Plus 8GB
₹12,400
(Out of Stock)
|
Lava Virat V1 5G
₹12,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
74%
|
Release Date
|
28 Jan, 2015
|
28 Jul, 2026
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6592
|
Unisoc T8200
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 1.7 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.7 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.7 inches (11.94 cm)
|
6.75 inches (17.15 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
|
540x960 px
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
2 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
2000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
10W
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.2
|
User Ratings
|
4/5
(11,496 ratings)
|
N/A
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
515,146
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
21h 27m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jan 28, 2015
(Official)
|
Jul 24, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
1 Year
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
2 Year
|
Custom UI
|
HTC Sense
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6592
|
Unisoc T8200
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 1.7 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Octa core
2.7 GHz, Single core, Cortex A76 2.3 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A76 2.1 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
32 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Mali-G57 MP4
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
515,146
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
20.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
312
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.7 inches (11.94 cm)
|
6.75 inches (17.15 cm)
|
Resolution
|
540x960 px
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
234 ppi
|
260 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
62.44 %
|
86.36 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Design
Height
|
139.8 mm
|
165.85 mm
|
Width
|
69.6 mm
|
76.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.8 mm
|
8.75 mm
|
Weight
|
154 grams
|
210 grams
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2 |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection Touch to focus |
Filters
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps 720x480 @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Slow Motion
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
1280x720 fps
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
2000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 47 Hours(2G)
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 10W in 185 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
21h 27m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
3h 7m 0s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB / 16 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|