HTC P5500 Nike vs Micromax Q75

Comparing the HTC P5500 Nike vs Micromax Q75 across camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Both HTC P5500 Nike and Micromax Q75 feature a 2 MP primary rear camera.

Battery: Micromax Q75 offers a higher battery capacity with 1200 mAh, while HTC P5500 Nike offers 1120 mAh, making Micromax Q75 better for longer battery life.

HTC P5500 Nike

(Discontinued)

Micromax Q75

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Oct, 2007

02 Sep, 2010

User Ratings

N/A	3.5/5 (120 ratings)

User Feedback

General

Operating System

Windows Mobile

N/A

Performance

RAM

64 MB

N/A

RAM Type

SDRAM

N/A

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

N/A	2.4 inches (6.1 cm)

Resolution

240x320 px

Pixel Density

N/A

167 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

24.06 %

Design

Height

106 mm

115 mm

Width

53 mm

64.5 mm

Thickness

15.00 mm

12.20 mm

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary CameraCMOS image sensor

2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

1120 mAh

1200 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 3(2G)

Up to 7(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

128 MB

N/A

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 8 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Yes Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 b/g)

Yes Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes v2

Yes

Multimedia

Audio Jack

N/A

3.5 mm

Music

N/A	Yes Music Formats: Yes Multi Format Music Player (Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV) with Background Music Playback

Sensors

Java

N/A

Yes

Browser

N/A

Yes

Phone Book

N/A	Yes 1000 Entries

SMS

N/A	Yes SMS Storage 1000

MMS

N/A

Yes

Email

N/A	Yes Zenga Mail

Other Facilities

N/A

EMS STK