Infibeam I500 vs Micromax Q50 Ezpad

Comparing the Infibeam I500 vs Micromax Q50 Ezpad across display, camera, battery and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Infibeam I500 offers a screen size of 3.2 inches, while Micromax Q50 Ezpad offers 2.2 inches, making Infibeam I500 the larger display of the two.

Rear Camera: Both Infibeam I500 and Micromax Q50 Ezpad feature a 2 MP primary rear camera.

Battery: Infibeam I500 offers a higher battery capacity with 1100 mAh, while Micromax Q50 Ezpad offers 1000 mAh, making Infibeam I500 better for longer battery life.

User Rating: Infibeam I500 receives a higher user rating of 4, while Micromax Q50 Ezpad has a rating of 3.5.

Infibeam I500

(Discontinued)

Micromax Q50 Ezpad

₹4,335

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

10 Aug, 2010

07 Oct, 2010

User Ratings

4/5

(1 rating)

3.5/5

(17 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

N/A

LCD

Screen Size

3.2 inches (8.13 cm)

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

Resolution

N/A	240x320 px

Pixel Density

N/A

182 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

21.93 %

Design

Height

113.5 mm

114 mm

Width

55 mm

60 mm

Thickness

13.00 mm

10.40 mm

Weight

N/A

96 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Image Resolution

1600 x 1200 Pixels

N/A

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Front Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Front Camera

N/A

Battery

Capacity

1100 mAh

1000 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

N/A	Up to 3(2G)

Storage

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 8 GB

Yes Up to 16 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Yes Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 b/g)

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV with 3.5 mm Audio Jack

Sensors

Java

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes	Yes 1000 Entries

SMS

Yes	Yes SMS Storage 1000

MMS

Yes