|
76%
Infinix Hot 40i
₹9,999
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
realme C53
₹10,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Infinix Hot 40i vs realme C53
Comparing the Infinix Hot 40i vs realme C53 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme C53 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,490, while Infinix Hot 40i scores 1,389, making realme C53 the better performer.
Display: realme C53 offers a screen size of 6.74 inches, while Infinix Hot 40i offers 6.6 inches, making realme C53 the larger display of the two. Both Infinix Hot 40i and realme C53 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: realme C53 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 108 MP, while Infinix Hot 40i offers 50 MP, making realme C53 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Infinix Hot 40i offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while realme C53 offers 8 MP, making Infinix Hot 40i better for front camera photography.
Battery: Infinix Hot 40i delivers longer battery life with 18h 52m, while realme C53 delivers 18h 01m, making Infinix Hot 40i the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: realme C53 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Infinix Hot 40i offers 256 GB, making realme C53 the better option for storage.
Expert Review: Infinix Hot 40i receives a higher expert rating of 7.5 from the editorial team, while realme C53 is rated 7.
User Rating: realme C53 receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Infinix Hot 40i has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
Infinix Hot 40i
₹9,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
realme C53
₹10,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
21 Feb, 2024
|
19 Jul, 2023
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Unisoc T606
|
Unisoc T612
|
|
Octa Core (upto 1.6 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
6.74 inches (17.12 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1612 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
108 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
0.08 MP
Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
18W Quick Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
256 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.5/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(23,014 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(137,011 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
266,030
AnTuTu Score
|
250,983
AnTuTu Score
|
|
18h 52m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
18h 01m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Feb 21, 2024
(Official)
|
Jul 19, 2023
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v13
|
Android v13
|
Custom UI
|
XOS
|
Realme UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Unisoc T606
|
Unisoc T612
|
Processor
|
Octa core
1.6 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.6 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57
|
Mali-G57
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
266,030
|
250,983
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
23.0 s
|
25.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
27.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
6.74 inches (17.12 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1612 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
480 nits
|
N/A
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
560 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
267 ppi
|
260 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
85.05 %
|
85.52 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
89.70 %
|
90.3 %
|
Design
Height
|
163.59 mm
|
167.2 mm
|
Width
|
75.59 mm
|
76.7 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.3 mm
|
7.9 mm
|
Weight
|
190 grams
|
186 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP53
|
N/A
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.6 Wide Angle1/2.8" sensor size |
108 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle 83° field-of-view23.6 mm focal length 1/1.67" sensor size S5KHM6 ISO-CELL 0.64µm pixel size |
|
0.08 MP
f/2.0 |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
12000 x 9000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Filters Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Short Video Mode
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
8 MP
f/2 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 18W Quick Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
18h 52m
|
18h 01m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 55m 49s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
256 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 2 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 1.183 W/kg Body: 0.775 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz MIMO
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
DTS Sound
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|