|
78%
Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G
₹16,999
(Out of Stock)
|
78%
POCO X4 Pro
₹19,499
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G vs POCO X4 Pro
Comparing the Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G vs POCO X4 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO X4 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,988, while Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G scores 1,789, making POCO X4 Pro the better performer.
Display: Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G offers a screen size of 6.7 inches, while POCO X4 Pro offers 6.67 inches, making Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G the larger display of the two. Both Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G and POCO X4 Pro feature the same AMOLED display.
Rear Camera: Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 108 MP, while POCO X4 Pro offers 64 MP, making Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G and POCO X4 Pro feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: POCO X4 Pro delivers longer battery life with 16h 56m, while Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G delivers 11h 57m, making POCO X4 Pro the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: POCO X4 Pro offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G offers 256 GB, making POCO X4 Pro the better option for storage.
User Rating: Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G and POCO X4 Pro both receive the same user rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G
₹16,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
POCO X4 Pro
₹19,499
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
78%
|
78%
|
Release Date
|
01 Sep, 2022
|
05 Apr, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G99
|
Snapdragon 695
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
108 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
64 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
33W Fast Charging
|
67W Sonic Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
256 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.4/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(6,525 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(94,011 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
380,698
AnTuTu Score
|
393,322
AnTuTu Score
|
|
11h 57m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
16h 56m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹19,499
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 01, 2022
(Official)
|
Apr 05, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v11
|
Custom UI
|
XOS
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G99
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 660 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 660 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
Adreno 619
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
380,698
|
393,322
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
20.0 s
|
26.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
4.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
38.5 %
|
29.9 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
1000 nits
|
1200 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
393 ppi
|
395 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
86.23 %
|
86.01 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
92 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
164.3 mm
|
164.1 mm
|
Width
|
76.5 mm
|
76.1 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.8 mm
|
8.1 mm
|
Weight
|
192 grams
|
205 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP53
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
108 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.75 Wide Angle1/1.67" sensor size S5KHM6 ISO-CELL |
64 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide AngleS5KGW3 ISOCELL Plus 0.7µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
12000 x 9000 Pixels
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
2k @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Dual Video Recording
Short Video Mode |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
16 MP
f/2.45 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 26.7 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 100% in 90 minutes
|
Yes 67W Sonic Charging 100% in 41 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
11h 57m
|
16h 56m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 35m 27s
|
0h 42m 47s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
256 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 2 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.861 W/kg Body: 0.583 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
DTS Sound
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹19,499
|