|
63%
Intex Aqua Octa
₹16,818
(Discontinued)
|
63%
XOLO Q3000
₹21,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Intex Aqua Octa vs XOLO Q3000
Comparing the Intex Aqua Octa vs XOLO Q3000 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Intex Aqua Octa runs at a higher processing speed of 1.7 GHz, while XOLO Q3000 runs at 1.5 GHz, making Intex Aqua Octa the better performer.
Display: Intex Aqua Octa offers a screen size of 6 inches, while XOLO Q3000 offers 5.7 inches, making Intex Aqua Octa the larger display of the two. Both Intex Aqua Octa and XOLO Q3000 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Intex Aqua Octa and XOLO Q3000 feature a 13 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Intex Aqua Octa and XOLO Q3000 feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: XOLO Q3000 offers a higher battery capacity with 4000 mAh, while Intex Aqua Octa offers 2300 mAh, making XOLO Q3000 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Intex Aqua Octa and XOLO Q3000 offer the same internal storage of 16 GB.
User Rating: Intex Aqua Octa receives a higher user rating of 3.6, while XOLO Q3000 has a rating of 3.1.
|
Intex Aqua Octa
₹16,818
(Discontinued)
|
XOLO Q3000
₹21,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
63%
|
63%
|
Release Date
|
02 Jan, 2014
|
21 Dec, 2013
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6592
|
MediaTek MT6589
|
|
(upto 1.7 GHz)
|
(upto 1.5 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
2 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.0 inches (15.24 cm)
|
5.7 inches (14.48 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
1080x1920 px (FULL HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
2300 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
16 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.6/5
(35 ratings)
|
3.1/5
(599 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Dec 21, 2013
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Below Avg
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6592
|
MediaTek MT6589
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 1.7 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.5 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-450 MP4
|
PowerVR SGX 544
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
2 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.0 inches (15.24 cm)
|
5.7 inches (14.48 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
1080x1920 px (FULL HD)
|
Pixel Density
|
245 ppi
|
386 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
75.96 %
|
66.56 %
|
Design
Height
|
161.6 mm
|
164.8 mm
|
Width
|
80.8 mm
|
81.6 mm
|
Thickness
|
7 mm
|
8.9 mm
|
Weight
|
180 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Camera |
13 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary CameraBSI Sensor |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
2300 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 21 Hours(3G) / Up to 33 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB
|
16 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|