|
52%
Intex Aqua Y3
₹4,490
(Discontinued)
|
XOLO Era 2
₹5,299
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Intex Aqua Y3 vs XOLO Era 2
Comparing the Intex Aqua Y3 vs XOLO Era 2 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: XOLO Era 2 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Intex Aqua Y3 runs at 1.0 GHz, making XOLO Era 2 the better performer.
Display: XOLO Era 2 offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Intex Aqua Y3 offers 4.5 inches, making XOLO Era 2 the larger display of the two. XOLO Era 2 features a IPS LCD display compared to Intex Aqua Y3's LCD, making XOLO Era 2 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Intex Aqua Y3 and XOLO Era 2 feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: XOLO Era 2 offers a higher front camera resolution with 5 MP, while Intex Aqua Y3 offers 0.3 MP, making XOLO Era 2 better for front camera photography.
Battery: XOLO Era 2 offers a higher battery capacity with 2350 mAh, while Intex Aqua Y3 offers 1600 mAh, making XOLO Era 2 better for longer battery life.
Storage: XOLO Era 2 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Intex Aqua Y3 offers 4 GB, making XOLO Era 2 the better option for storage.
User Rating: Intex Aqua Y3 and XOLO Era 2 both receive the same user rating of 3.8.
|
Intex Aqua Y3
₹4,490
(Discontinued)
|
XOLO Era 2
₹5,299
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
29 Dec, 2014
|
27 Oct, 2016
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
Spreadtrum SC9832A
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x854 px
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1600 mAh
|
2350 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(69 ratings)
|
3.8/5
(12,294 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Oct 27, 2016
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Android v6.0 (Marshmallow)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
Spreadtrum SC9832A
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
DDR3
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
218 ppi
|
196 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
61.05 %
|
64.29 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
No
|
Design
Height
|
134 mm
|
146.5 mm
|
Width
|
68.2 mm
|
73 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.9 mm
|
9.2 mm
|
Weight
|
141 grams
|
145 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.0 |
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection |
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1600 mAh
|
2350 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|