|
53%
Intex Cloud Cube
₹3,299
(Out of Stock)
|
Lava Iris Atom
₹2,499
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Intex Cloud Cube vs Lava Iris Atom
Comparing the Intex Cloud Cube vs Lava Iris Atom across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lava Iris Atom runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Intex Cloud Cube runs at 1.2 GHz, making Lava Iris Atom the better performer.
Display: Intex Cloud Cube offers a screen size of 4.5 inches, while Lava Iris Atom offers 4 inches, making Intex Cloud Cube the larger display of the two. Both Intex Cloud Cube and Lava Iris Atom feature the same TFT display.
Rear Camera: Lava Iris Atom offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Intex Cloud Cube offers 2 MP, making Lava Iris Atom better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Intex Cloud Cube and Lava Iris Atom feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Intex Cloud Cube offers a higher battery capacity with 2000 mAh, while Lava Iris Atom offers 1550 mAh, making Intex Cloud Cube better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Intex Cloud Cube and Lava Iris Atom offer the same internal storage of 8 GB.
User Rating: Intex Cloud Cube receives a higher user rating of 3.5, while Lava Iris Atom has a rating of 3.3.
|
✕
Intex Cloud Cube
₹3,299
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Lava Iris Atom
₹2,499
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
53%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
25 Nov, 2015
|
28 Dec, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
Spreadtrum SC7731G
|
N/A
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
|
480x854 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
2000 mAh
|
1550 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
8 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.5/5
(6,774 ratings)
|
3.3/5
(5,072 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Nov 25, 2015
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v5.1 (Lollipop)
|
Android v5.1 (Lollipop)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
Spreadtrum SC7731G
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400 MP2
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
218 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
62.51 %
|
57.37 %
|
Screen Protection
|
No
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
135 mm
|
126 mm
|
Width
|
66 mm
|
63 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.5 mm
|
10 mm
|
Weight
|
145 grams
|
109 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
OIS
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
No
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
2000 mAh
|
1550 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 5 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 9 Hours(3G) / Up to 12.5 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
8 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
N/A
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|