Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Itel P40 vs POCO C51
Comparing the Itel P40 vs POCO C51 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO C51 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.2 GHz, while Itel P40 runs at 1.6 GHz, making POCO C51 the better performer.
Display: Itel P40 offers a screen size of 6.6 inches, while POCO C51 offers 6.52 inches, making Itel P40 the larger display of the two. Both Itel P40 and POCO C51 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Itel P40 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while POCO C51 offers 8 MP, making Itel P40 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Itel P40 and POCO C51 feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Itel P40 offers a higher battery capacity with 6000 mAh, while POCO C51 offers 5000 mAh, making Itel P40 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Itel P40 and POCO C51 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
User Rating: POCO C51 receives a higher user rating of 4, while Itel P40 has a rating of 3.8.
Summary
Spec Score
|
64%
|
71%
|
Release Date
|
16 Mar, 2023
|
10 Apr, 2023
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Unisoc SC9863A
|
MediaTek Helio G36
|
|
Octa Core (upto 1.6 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
6.52 inches (16.56 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1612 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
0.3 MP
Camera
|
0.08 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
N/A
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(1,194 ratings)
|
4/5
(224,219 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
103,483
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
20h 33m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Apr 10, 2023
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v13
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
2 Years
|
Custom UI
|
Android Go
|
Android Go
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Unisoc SC9863A
|
MediaTek Helio G36
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
1.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 1.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
28 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8322
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
RAM
|
2 GB / 3 GB / 4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
103,483
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
36.0 s
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
6.52 inches (16.56 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1612 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
400 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Pixel Density
|
267 ppi
|
269 ppi
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
N/A
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
80.66 %
|
Design
Height
|
N/A
|
165.9 mm
|
Width
|
N/A
|
76.7 mm
|
Thickness
|
N/A
|
9 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
192 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.0 Wide Angle |
|
0.3 MP
|
0.08 MP
Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Settings
|
N/A
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Short Video Mode
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
N/A
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
20h 33m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
2h 34m 30s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 32 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.966 W/kg Body: 0.873 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|