|
53%
Karbonn A19
₹6,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Karbonn A19 vs Lava Iris 406q
Comparing the Karbonn A19 vs Lava Iris 406q across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Karbonn A19 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Lava Iris 406q runs at 1.2 GHz, making Karbonn A19 the better performer.
Display: Karbonn A19 offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Lava Iris 406q offers 4 inches, making Karbonn A19 the larger display of the two. Karbonn A19 features a LCD display compared to Lava Iris 406q's TFT, making Karbonn A19 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Karbonn A19 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Lava Iris 406q offers 5 MP, making Karbonn A19 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Karbonn A19 and Lava Iris 406q feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher battery capacity with 1700 mAh, while Karbonn A19 offers 1600 mAh, making Lava Iris 406q better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Karbonn A19 and Lava Iris 406q offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Lava Iris 406q receives a higher user rating of 3.7, while Karbonn A19 has a rating of 3.2.
|
✕
Karbonn A19
₹6,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
53%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
21 Feb, 2014
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
|
480x854 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1600 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.2/5
(57 ratings)
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Feb 21, 2014
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
196 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
65.52 %
|
57.38 %
|
Design
Height
|
146 mm
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
72 mm
|
64 mm
|
Thickness
|
11 mm
|
10.3 mm
|
Weight
|
116 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1600 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|