|
52%
Karbonn K9 Smart
₹3,400
(Out of Stock)
|
Xccess A1 Elite
₹2,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Karbonn K9 Smart vs Xccess A1 Elite
Comparing the Karbonn K9 Smart vs Xccess A1 Elite across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xccess A1 Elite runs at a higher processing speed of 1.5 GHz, while Karbonn K9 Smart runs at 1.2 GHz, making Xccess A1 Elite the better performer.
Display: Both Karbonn K9 Smart and Xccess A1 Elite offer the same screen size of 5 inches, but Xccess A1 Elite features a IPS LCD display compared to Karbonn K9 Smart's TFT, making Xccess A1 Elite the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Xccess A1 Elite offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Karbonn K9 Smart offers 3.2 MP, making Xccess A1 Elite better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Xccess A1 Elite offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while Karbonn K9 Smart offers 1.3 MP, making Xccess A1 Elite better for front camera photography.
Battery: Karbonn K9 Smart offers a higher battery capacity with 2300 mAh, while Xccess A1 Elite offers 2000 mAh, making Karbonn K9 Smart better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Karbonn K9 Smart and Xccess A1 Elite offer the same internal storage of 8 GB.
User Rating: Karbonn K9 Smart receives a higher user rating of 3.4, while Xccess A1 Elite has a rating of 2.8.
|
✕
Karbonn K9 Smart
₹3,400
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Xccess A1 Elite
₹2,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
03 Jan, 2016
|
23 Jun, 2016
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
N/A
|
|
Dual Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.5 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x854 px
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
1.3 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
2300 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
8 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.4/5
(1,297 ratings)
|
2.8/5
(63 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jan 03, 2016
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Android v5.1 (Lollipop)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.5 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400 MP
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Pixel Density
|
196 ppi
|
294 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
64.13 %
|
67.96 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
144.7 mm
|
142.5 mm
|
Width
|
74.1 mm
|
71 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.1 mm
|
8.3 mm
|
Weight
|
146.3 grams
|
152 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
No
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2048 x 1536 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
N/A
|
No
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
2300 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 6 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 8 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
8 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 64 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
N/A
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|