Karbonn Titanium S1 Plus
₹5,990
(Out of Stock)
|
54%
Celkon Win 400
₹1,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Karbonn Titanium S1 Plus vs Celkon Win 400
Comparing the Karbonn Titanium S1 Plus vs Celkon Win 400 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Celkon Win 400 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Karbonn Titanium S1 Plus runs at 1.2 GHz, making Celkon Win 400 the better performer.
Display: Both Karbonn Titanium S1 Plus and Celkon Win 400 offer the same screen size of 4 inches, but Karbonn Titanium S1 Plus features a LCD display compared to Celkon Win 400's TFT, making Karbonn Titanium S1 Plus the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Karbonn Titanium S1 Plus and Celkon Win 400 feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Celkon Win 400 offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while Karbonn Titanium S1 Plus offers 0.3 MP, making Celkon Win 400 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both Karbonn Titanium S1 Plus and Celkon Win 400 offer the same 1500 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Both Karbonn Titanium S1 Plus and Celkon Win 400 offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Celkon Win 400 receives a higher user rating of 4, while Karbonn Titanium S1 Plus has a rating of 3.5.
|
✕
Karbonn Titanium S1 Plus
₹5,990
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Celkon Win 400
₹1,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
54%
|
Release Date
|
26 Apr, 2014
|
27 Nov, 2014
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
Snapdragon 200
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
0.3 MP
|
1.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1500 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.5/5
(374 ratings)
|
4/5
(28 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Apr 26, 2014
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
N/A
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 302
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
57.33 %
|
55.82 %
|
Design
Height
|
124 mm
|
125.4 mm
|
Width
|
64 mm
|
65 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.3 mm
|
10.3 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
121 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1280x720 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1500 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 3.5 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 5 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|