|
54%
Karbonn Titanium S99
₹5,999
(Discontinued)
|
Intex Aqua Eco
₹3,161
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Karbonn Titanium S99 vs Intex Aqua Eco
Comparing the Karbonn Titanium S99 vs Intex Aqua Eco across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Karbonn Titanium S99 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Intex Aqua Eco runs at 1.2 GHz, making Karbonn Titanium S99 the better performer.
Display: Both Karbonn Titanium S99 and Intex Aqua Eco offer the same screen size of 4 inches, but Karbonn Titanium S99 features a IPS LCD display compared to Intex Aqua Eco's TFT, making Karbonn Titanium S99 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Karbonn Titanium S99 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Intex Aqua Eco offers 3.2 MP, making Karbonn Titanium S99 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Intex Aqua Eco offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while Karbonn Titanium S99 offers 0.3 MP, making Intex Aqua Eco better for front camera photography.
Battery: Intex Aqua Eco offers a higher battery capacity with 1500 mAh, while Karbonn Titanium S99 offers 1400 mAh, making Intex Aqua Eco better for longer battery life.
Storage: Intex Aqua Eco offers higher internal storage with 512 GB, while Karbonn Titanium S99 offers 4 GB, making Intex Aqua Eco the better option for storage.
User Rating: Karbonn Titanium S99 receives a higher user rating of 3.5, while Intex Aqua Eco has a rating of 3.2.
|
✕
Karbonn Titanium S99
₹5,999
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Intex Aqua Eco
₹3,161
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
54%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
23 Jun, 2014
|
16 Jan, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
1.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1400 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
512 MB
|
User Ratings
|
3.5/5
(104 ratings)
|
3.2/5
(36 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4 (KitKat)
|
Android v4.2.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400 MP2
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
51.83 %
|
55.12 %
|
Design
Height
|
133 mm
|
127.1 mm
|
Width
|
66 mm
|
65 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.7 mm
|
10.2 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
106 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
3.2 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
No
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2048 x 1536 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
Continuous Shooting
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash |
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1400 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 7 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
512 MB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|