Ken C1 vs Micromax A57 Ninja 3

Share  

Comparing the Ken C1 vs Micromax A57 Ninja 3 across camera to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Micromax A57 Ninja 3 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 3 MP, while Ken C1 offers 0.3 MP, making Micromax A57 Ninja 3 better for rear camera photography.

...read more
Ken C1
(Discontinued)
Micromax A57 Ninja 3
₹5,999
(Discontinued)
Add to Compare

Summary

Release Date

10 Nov, 2011
01 Sep, 2012

Performance

N/A
(upto 1.3 GHz)
N/A
256 MB RAM

Display

1.8 inches (4.57 cm)
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
LCD
TFT
240x320 px
320x480 px

Rear Camera

0.3 MP
Primary Camera
3 MP
Primary Camera

Battery

N/A
1400 mAh

Storage

N/A
512 MB

User Ratings

N/A
3.8/5
(528 ratings)

User Feedback

General

Operating System

N/A
Android v2.3.5 (Gingerbread)

Performance

Processor

N/A
Dual core, 1.3 GHz

Graphics (GPU)

N/A
Adreno 200

RAM

N/A
256 MB

Display

Display Type

LCD
TFT

Screen Size

1.8 inches  (4.57 cm)
3.5 inches  (8.89 cm)

Resolution

240x320 px
320x480 px

Pixel Density

222 ppi
165 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A
50.72 %

Design

Height

N/A
116 mm

Width

N/A
62 mm

Thickness

N/A
11.50 mm

Weight

N/A
93 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera
3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes
N/A

Image Resolution

N/A
2000 x 1504 Pixels

Shooting Modes

Continuous Shooting
N/A

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection
Digital Zoom

Battery

Capacity

N/A
1400 mAh

Battery Type

N/A
Li-ion

TalkTime

N/A
Up to 7.5 Hours(3G) / Up to 8.5 Hours(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

N/A
512 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes
Yes Up to 32 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM
Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported
5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

No
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)

Bluetooth

Yes
Yes v2.1

GPS

N/A
Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player
N/A

Sensors

Other Sensors

N/A
Proximity sensor Accelerometer

Java

No
N/A

Browser

Yes
N/A

Phone Book

Yes
N/A

SMS

Yes
N/A